Teams

OC LLW Los Cab - Tracy - Sun1

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 5.0

12 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-29vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Beindorf / Chihiro Abiko vs Jennifer Uyeda / Ripley Uyeda6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesQuynh Le vs Jinna Johnson6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Caldwell / Eleanor Hammargren vs Margaret Chang / Dana Kim6-2, 6-2
2025-06-22vs OC LaHabra TC - LLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristine Kouyoumjian / Amy Caldwell vs Karen Trinh / Aki Eguchi6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-15vs OC LPC - MouttapaLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristine Kouyoumjian / Jessica Stewart vs Janice Chang / Melissa Rosenthal5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-18vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 10
W#1 DoublesEleanor Hammargren / Kristine Kouyoumjian vs Jinna Johnson / Erica Smalley6-2, 6-1
2025-05-17vs OC LaHabra TC - LWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristine Kouyoumjian / Eleanor Hammargren vs Karen Trinh / Elizaveta Buckbee6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.03
Kathy Archibald
published
4.87
Chihiro Abiko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.84
Tiana Takenaga
published
4.81
Quynh Le
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.80
Dianne Matias
published 5
4.79
Kristine Kouyoumjian
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.70
Andrea Madrigal
published 5
4.64
Eleanor Hammargren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.61
Jennifer Beindorf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.57
Farrah Northcott
published
4.26
Karen Haas
published
4.09
Kristina McKee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Archibald + Eleanor Hammargren4164% games+4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Archibald
17W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
5.03
5
Chihiro Abiko
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.87
Tiana Takenaga
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.84
Quynh Le
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Dianne Matias
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Kristine Kouyoumjian
161W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Andrea Madrigal
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.70
Eleanor Hammargren
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.64
Jennifer Beindorf
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
Farrah Northcott
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.57
Karen Haas
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.26
Kristina McKee
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.