Teams

MO/Albrecht

2025 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-30vs AR-MO/Foley/Thompson/Mtn HomeWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Criner / Norma Prifti vs Theia Foley / Carolyn Kelley6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJudy Alles / Janis Willmann vs Sharon Thompson / Cathy Knight6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Kimberly Bohnenkamp / Laura Ilardi vs Gretchen Kuhn / Yvonne Bussmann6-2, 6-3
2025-04-29vs TX/Texas Blossoms/VernorLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudy Alles / Janis Willmann vs Sheila Wilson / Joann Privitello6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Criner / Norma Prifti vs Jo Ann Byrd / Cynthia Lang6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Kimberly Bohnenkamp / Gail Frapolli vs Belinda Canonico / Susan Burton3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Norma Prifti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Barbara Criner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Janis Willmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Gail Frapolli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Judy Alles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Ilardi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Kimberly Bohnenkamp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rose Albrecht
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Criner + Norma Prifti12557% games+7.4% vs expected
Gail Frapolli + Mary Kimberly Bohnenkamp152747% games−2.5% vs expected
Janis Willmann + Norma Prifti16954% games−4.0% vs expected
Rose Albrecht + Janis Willmann4344% games−10.4% vs expected
Barbara Criner + Janis Willmann3351% games−13.3% vs expected
Rose Albrecht + Norma Prifti5354% gamesnot enough data
Rose Albrecht + Mary Kimberly Bohnenkamp314 matchesnot enough data
Gail Frapolli + Janis Willmann134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Norma Prifti
163W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Barbara Criner
72W–101L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Janis Willmann
115W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
Gail Frapolli
29W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Judy Alles
31W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Ilardi
27W–54L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Kimberly Bohnenkamp
53W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rose Albrecht
54W–65L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.