Teams

Wickertree

2022 Winter A40&O · 2022 Winter A40&O 3.0 WOMEN Monday

14 players · average NTRP 3.07 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-03-21vs Elysium 2Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMelissa Dine / Beth Hackworth vs Marcia Tyack / Jill Wienke0-6, 2-6
2022-02-28vs Elysium 1Won 10
W#3 DoublesJulia Happel / Beth Hackworth vs Lori Russell / Melinda Kane6-4, 6-4
2022-02-07vs ScarboroughLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathleen Martin / Beth Hackworth vs Marilee Hanna / Reem Ghanem1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2022 Winter A40&O 3.0 WOMEN Monday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wickertree0923469431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Ami Latham
published 3.5
3.14
Alexandra Bernard
published 3.5
3.12
Lina de Felice
published
3.01
Beth Hackworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Allison Kleinman
published 3
2.84
Libby Seeley
published
2.68
Michelle Goodman
published
2.65
Laura Ryzenman
published
2.62
Midge Taylor
published
2.52
Liz Daly
published
2.24
Frieda Hoheisel
published 2.5
2.20
Daphne Suh
published 2.5
Susan Busch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daphne Suh + Libby Seeley4652% games+9.6% vs expected
Libby Seeley + Alexandra Bernard8457% games+4.3% vs expected
Alexandra Bernard + Midge Taylor4258% games+2.4% vs expected
Daphne Suh + Heather Sankovich2439% games+0.6% vs expected
Liz Daly + Heather Sankovich3246% games+0.4% vs expected
Libby Seeley + Midge Taylor8851% games+0.4% vs expected
Laura Ryzenman + Michelle Goodman343250% games−0.8% vs expected
Midge Taylor + Frieda Hoheisel2540% games−1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ami Latham
222W–203L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Alexandra Bernard
136W–127L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Lina de Felice
144W–127L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Beth Hackworth
99W–82L career · 3 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Allison Kleinman
85W–85L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Libby Seeley
178W–106L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Heather Sankovich
42W–109L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Goodman
90W–98L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Laura Ryzenman
57W–83L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Midge Taylor
142W–154L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
Liz Daly
68W–88L career · no lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Frieda Hoheisel
29W–99L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Daphne Suh
43W–110L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.20
Susan Busch
108W–65L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.