Teams

GJTC JWENDT

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs GJTC JPAREGIENWon 20
W#2 DoublesJeff Thornton / Blake Bickham vs Rodney Sharp / Stuart Hall6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJoseph Pologar / John Wendt vs Kriss Burwell / John Groves6-4, 6-2
2021-07-16vs GJTC RPLETTWon 20
W#2 DoublesAaron Clay / Blake Bickham vs John Kohls / David Pacini6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoseph Pologar / Wayne Smith vs Steve Watson / Lee Smith3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-07-06vs GJTC KKILLIANWon 10
W#3 DoublesBlake Bickham / Joseph Pologar vs Dan Terrell / Seth Ritchey6-3, 7-6
2021-06-29vs GJTC JPAREGIENLost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Ott / Blake Bickham vs Craig Smith / John Hanna6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-06-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Ott / Blake Bickham vs Steve Hurshman / Steve Watson6-1, 6-3
2021-06-22vs GJTC RPLETTWon 10
W#1 DoublesBlake Bickham / Milo Johnson vs Steve Hurshman / Jimmy Renfroe6-1, 6-3
2021-06-08vs GJTC JPAREGIENLost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Ott / Blake Bickham vs John Hanna / Christopher Cutsforth3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Richard Ott
published
3.35
Alan MacH
published 3.5
3.33
Mathew Dokoupil
published 3.5
3.31
Blake Bickham
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.26
Jeff Thornton
published
3.24
Aaron Clay
published 3.5
2.98
Wayne Smith
published
2.87
John Wendt
published
2.82
Joseph Pologar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wayne Smith + Blake Bickham4356% games+8.3% vs expected
Mathew Dokoupil + Alan MacH6452% games+2.5% vs expected
Alan MacH + John Wendt4161% games−0.8% vs expected
Wayne Smith + John Wendt5645% games−12.5% vs expected
Wayne Smith + Joseph Pologar1442% gamesnot enough data
Richard Ott + Mathew Dokoupil134 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Smith + Jeff Thornton224 matchesnot enough data
Mathew Dokoupil + Joseph Pologar314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Ott
22W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Alan MacH
38W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Mathew Dokoupil
83W–44L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Blake Bickham
77W–46L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Jeff Thornton
65W–53L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Aaron Clay
10W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
Wayne Smith
27W–52L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.98
John Wendt
23W–24L career · no lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Joseph Pologar
38W–34L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.