Teams

CCV PINK

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs PRC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeanna Nunemaker / Maureen Simon vs Amber Harris / Sarah Hughes2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesErin Aller Haucke vs Celeste Gardner6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJen Hager / Annie Vandan vs Kari Graham / Sharon Kisch3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAlice Ley / Crista Glucksman vs Michele Shaw / Lori Lee1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-06vs SS-LT GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Aller Haucke / Jeanna Nunemaker vs Angie Van Wyk / Audrey Simkins5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesEmily Gill vs Kelly Kinder3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlice Ley / Maureen Simon vs Kimberly Jester / Ann Reidy4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-29vs CPV BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesAlice Ley / Maureen Simon vs Andrea Smart / Elizabeth Zeller4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesErin Aller Haucke vs Marcie Mirbaba4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDana McDonald / Jen Hager vs Bobbie Mantey / Betsy Heggie0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Gill / Crista Glucksman vs Carrie Manion / JoAnn DelMonte3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-22vs PRKR NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDana McDonald / Alice Ley vs Andrea Vickers / Katherine Wilson0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesErin Aller Haucke vs Susan Goldman6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaureen Simon / Emily Gill vs Lisa Mullins / Shannon Fronapfel3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJen Hager / Jeanna Nunemaker vs Kristen Warnick / Pamela Smith6-3, 6-4
2026-06-15vs RRTC YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesEmily Gill / Jeanna Nunemaker vs Patricia Colella / Laura Peterson6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMaureen Simon vs Ilana Reed1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Guo / Annie Vandan vs Taylor Spalding / Lisa Hardin5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJen Hager / Alice Ley vs Sari Nicholson / Christy Battaglia6-2, 6-2
2026-06-08vs PCC GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesErin Aller Haucke / Emily Gill vs Misty Candela / Darlene Odean6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJeanna Nunemaker vs Laura Wren2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDana McDonald / Maureen Simon vs Carolyn Watson / Dawn D'Amato2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJen Hager / Jenny Guo vs Marti Longo / Cherie Lakin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-01vs SH GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnnie Vandan / Jeanna Nunemaker vs Abby Good / MELISSA DRAZEN-SMITH2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDana McDonald vs Jill St. John3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Gill / Erin Aller Haucke vs Bongsook Riewe / Catherine Winter6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJen Hager / Maureen Simon vs Suzy Vaughn / Julia Larrew3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTA-C TEAL6120823225
2KC-CC SILVER43141431248
3CR-B GREEN25101837262
4CCV PINK1691940275
5CCV PURPLE1672146310
6LAC GREEN0752349317
7HIW TEAL0732552329

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Erin Aller Haucke
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Emily Gill
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Maureen Simon
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.58
Jenny Guo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Jeanna Nunemaker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.52
Alice Ley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.52
Dana McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Jen Hager
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Crista Glucksman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.44
Annie Vandan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Ginny Shaw
published
Nani Tessema
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Aller Haucke + Emily Gill4156% games+10.1% vs expected
Alice Ley + Maureen Simon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Aller Haucke
18W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Emily Gill
5W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Maureen Simon
2W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
Jenny Guo
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Jeanna Nunemaker
4W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Alice Ley
10W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
2.52
3
Dana McDonald
4W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Jen Hager
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Crista Glucksman
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
3
Annie Vandan
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Ginny Shaw
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nani Tessema
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.