Teams

DCC GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.65 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-02vs CACM BLACKWon 32
W#1 DoublesLindsay Filsinger / Sara McDonnell vs Sarah Jensik / Patricia Olson6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTia Wolkov vs Alison Grace Bui7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Benes / Gina Carbone Fenton vs Midori Clark / Inessa McGill7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSusan Golinvaux vs Kai Peters2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobyn Larkin / Dory Pratt vs Mary Mathis / Samantha Hanson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-26vs WP NAVYLost 23
W#1 DoublesHeather Benes / Brooke Simpson vs Kelly Connor / Ashley Banister-Riley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDory Pratt vs Katie Oppliger0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSara McDonnell / Robyn Larkin vs Maureen Connor / Carolyn Welter4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTia Wolkov vs Carrie Lee6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Golinvaux / Kendra Connors vs Kathleen Connor / Lindsey Bieging6-1, 6-1
2022-05-19vs GTC GREENWon 50
W#1 DoublesHeather Benes / Gina Carbone Fenton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLindsay Filsinger vs Rausny Merchant6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDory Pratt / Robyn Larkin vs VERA DIVENYI / Casey Thomas6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSusan Golinvaux vs Celeste Kopperl6-0, 1-1
W#3 DoublesKate Lively / Sara McDonnell vs Jane Harmon / Ginger Merry6-0, 6-1
2022-05-12vs CM BLUEWon 41
W#1 DoublesKate Lively / Sara McDonnell vs Romi Hovey / Cindy Sawyer6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTia Wolkov vs Taylor Pardun6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeather Benes / Claudia Garza vs Margaret Deline / Holly Flannigan6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLindsay Filsinger vs Jennifer Kane6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDory Pratt / Robyn Larkin vs Katie Comisky / Kristi Keil6-3, 7-6
2022-05-05vs JCC REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesBrooke Simpson / Lindsay Filsinger vs Minou Cramer / Brooke O'Drobinak3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTia Wolkov vs Alexandra Iseman6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHeather Benes / Gina Carbone Fenton vs Julie Snyder / Elizabeth Schanker6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKate Lively vs Linda Thurman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Golinvaux / Kendra Connors vs Jessica Sanderson / Kimi Davis4-6, 1-6
2022-04-28vs GPTC YELLOWWon 32
L#1 DoublesDory Pratt / Claudia Garza vs Nichole Milton / Jessica Diamond1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBrittany Rogers vs Somin Lee6-4, 2-2
W#2 DoublesTia Wolkov / Kate Lively vs Sonya Watts / Kimberly Miller6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBrooke Simpson vs Lucy Downey6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKendra Connors / Susan Golinvaux vs Lindsay Gordon / Veronica Lequire6-2, 6-2
2022-04-21vs DTC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesHeather Benes / Brittany Rogers vs Cristin Bracken / Sarah Killeen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTia Wolkov vs Lindsay Freeman4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLindsay Filsinger / Sara McDonnell vs Leslie Greer / Ilene Vivinetto7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobyn Larkin / Kate Lively vs Liz Donahue / Ashley Daidone6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings52 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CK NAVY7026920220
2RRTC BLUE7026923262
3CACI GOLD7026924261
4HRCA PURPLE6126921243
5KC BLACK61231228252
6BCC RED61211432281
7CACI YELLOW61231232287
8CACM GOLD61221334312
9JCC RED61221335297
10GTC PURPLE52231227286
11ATC RED52251028274
12DCC GREEN52231228257
13GPTC YELLOW52221330284
14NJ VIOLET52231230316
15MEA SILVER52211433316
16APR YELLOW52211433316
17GCC NAVY52181740330
18BCC BLUE42171331253
19WP SILVER43231229283
20NJ PURPLE43211432279
21CACM BLACK43201534298
22SKY TEAL43201537302
23LAC RED43171841310
24PCC RED33171327266
25BTA GOLD33141636277
26PH BRONZE34181739330
27CP GOLD34161941326
28HRCA ORANGE34171843328
29HW TEAL34171845330
30PCRK RED34161946347
31CVTA YELLOW34152046334
32KNO PINK34152047352
33VCC ORANGE34122349344
34BRMST PINK24131738295
35CACM SILVER25152043343
36PCRK BLUE25142147324
37MEA PINK25152047362
38BTA RED25142148350
39PRC RED25132248337
40WP PINK25142148349
41LEBTC SILVER25102552346
42HFII GREEN25112453383
43WP GOLD16142144334
44HRCA SILVER16142145336
45CPV RED16122348330
46MC YELLOW16112452357
47HV GREEN16112453373
48RMTC PINK1672857389
49CHCC BLUE1672858382
50GTC GREEN1672859393
51RMTC SILVER0782756353
52EPR GREEN0772860395

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Brittany Rogers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Robyn Larkin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Lindsay Filsinger
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.42
Tia Wolkov
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.30
Brooke Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Sara McDonnell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Claudia Garza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Gina Carbone Fenton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Kendra Connors
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Heather Benes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Dory Pratt
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Kate Lively
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Susan Golinvaux
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Larkin + Lindsay Filsinger5165% games+11.5% vs expected
Lindsay Filsinger + Brittany Rogers9259% games+10.7% vs expected
Dory Pratt + Lindsay Filsinger5066% games+9.8% vs expected
Sara McDonnell + Kate Lively14360% games+5.6% vs expected
Robyn Larkin + Kate Lively5262% games+5.2% vs expected
Sara McDonnell + Lindsay Filsinger8363% games+4.1% vs expected
Brooke Simpson + Sara McDonnell8356% games+2.9% vs expected
Heather Benes + Gina Carbone Fenton271353% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brittany Rogers
42W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Robyn Larkin
65W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Lindsay Filsinger
107W–53L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Tia Wolkov
108W–37L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Brooke Simpson
63W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Sara McDonnell
57W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Claudia Garza
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gina Carbone Fenton
51W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Kendra Connors
26W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Heather Benes
60W–45L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Dory Pratt
66W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Kate Lively
63W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Susan Golinvaux
20W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.