Teams

PLEASANTON 40MX7.0A

2023 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-13vs BAY TREES PK 40MX7.0BLost 01
L#3 DoublesTraci Rebiejo / Gurupreet Chabda vs Mei Lo / Daniel Hodsdon5-7, 6-7
2023-07-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesSharon Nasstrom / Gurupreet Chabda vs Yemia Hashimoto / David Souza4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-23vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 40MX7.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesGurupreet Chabda / Traci Rebiejo vs ARMAAN SHAAFI / Cindy Mark6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Steven Lehmer
published
3.71
Abby Sexton
published 4
3.63
Lloyd Hohenstein
published
3.58
Dan Helmer
published 3.5
3.49
Mehrdad Mohebi
published
3.45
Gurupreet Chabda
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Benjamin Cha
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.29
Nilo Clava
published
3.26
Jeff Gear
published
3.13
Angela Schmidt
published 3.5
3.11
Michelle Weiss
published
3.07
Kyle Jones
published
2.91
Malou Matthew
published
2.85
Traci Rebiejo
published
Dana Thompson
published 3
2.52
Elaine Marshall
published
Leslie Souttaphonh
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Lehmer
26W–20L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Abby Sexton
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Lloyd Hohenstein
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Dan Helmer
37W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
Mehrdad Mohebi
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Gurupreet Chabda
67W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Benjamin Cha
64W–60L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Nilo Clava
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Jeff Gear
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Angela Schmidt
10W–25L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Michelle Weiss
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Kyle Jones
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Malou Matthew
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
Traci Rebiejo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Dana Thompson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Leslie Souttaphonh
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.