← Teams

VTC-Kardas/Marcus

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.09 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Alex Harbell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.28
Jeff Marcus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Dennis Pelton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
David Vail
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Geri Marcus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Michael Lemmons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Stephanie Harbell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Grey Proctor
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Kathryn Harlan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Irina Stolerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
—
Jennifer Gwin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2024-12-07Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMichael Lemmons / Stephanie Harbell vs Theresa Hagerty / David Williams4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGeri Marcus / David Vail vs Jacqueline Babb Milligan / Wes Milligan6-2, 6-4
2024-12-06Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJennifer Gwin / Alex Harbell vs Spencer Byrd / Sarah Partch6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Harlan / David Vail vs Monique Gill / Brandon Campos6-3, 6-3
2024-11-23Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesDavid Vail / Carrie Schill vs Chase Stowell / Clare Belott6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Gwin / Grey Proctor vs Andre Golovchenko / Elizabeth Hayes6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-11-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCarrie Schill / Alex Harbell vs Paul Garrahan / Heidi Cronn6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGrey Proctor / Geri Marcus vs Joel Naumoff / Madeleine Bourland6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Vail / Kathryn Harlan vs Ryan Linnman / Anna Ringelberg2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAlex Harbell / Carrie Schill vs Natasha Brady / Peter Layzell7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Michael Lemmons vs Adela Dalmau / David-Richard Layzekk6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDennis Pelton / Stephanie Pelton vs Heidi Seinige / Gerald Snell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-20Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesGrey Proctor / Geri Marcus vs Paul Kim / Jamie Melton6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Marcus / Abby Guttormsen vs Thomas Bollaert / Jennifer Pultz6-2, 6-3
2024-09-22Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAlex Harbell / Carrie Schill vs Genelynne Jian / Jeremy Chiang7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Lemmons / Stephanie Harbell vs Jenica Susi / Danny Tran5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Clark / Irina Stolerman vs Cynthia Novac-Yu / Siddharth Dugar6-2, 6-3
2024-09-06Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Gwin / Alex Harbell vs Jennifer Pultz / David Floyd6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGeri Marcus / Matt Avalon vs Paul Kim / Jamie Melton6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alex Harbell
127W–53L career
5%95%0%
3.67
3.5
Jeff Marcus
34W–49L career
2%95%3%
3.28
3.5
Dennis Pelton
15W–32L career
8%87%5%
3.25
3
David Vail
41W–34L career
0%96%4%
2.88
3
Geri Marcus
47W–61L career
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Michael Lemmons
25W–30L career
not enough data
—
3
Stephanie Harbell
70W–26L career
not enough data
—
3
Grey Proctor
13W–54L career
3%97%0%
2.69
3
Kathryn Harlan
20W–40L career
14%84%3%
2.69
2.5
Irina Stolerman
24W–47L career
0%34%66%
2.53
2.5
Jennifer Gwin
34W–47L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.