Teams

The Players Club

2026 FALL A55&O · FALL Adult 55&Over Women 8.0 Wednesday

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-01-07vs Racquet ClubSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGina Urwin / Yuko Seitz vs Pat Rothney / Janine Kiser6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYumi Danford / Fujiko Itabashi vs Barbara Sinclair / Cindy Benedict5-7, 4-2, 0-1
2025-12-03vs OlympicWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Barbao / Kris Susa vs Lois Dosky / Rebecca Long7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Royer / Yuko Seitz vs Katherine Eisnaugle / Linda Guyton7-6, 5-3
L#3 DoublesTammy M Jarrett / Melissa Grether vs Mary Bacon / Kathleen Kinnard4-6, 0-6
2025-11-19vs Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Barbao / Yuko Seitz vs Barbara Sinclair / Susan Sugar6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacey Royer / Amy Rupp vs Pat Rothney / Susan Snyder6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFujiko Itabashi / Yumi Danford vs Shelley Finley / Linda Ranck6-3, 6-1
2025-11-05vs OlympicLost 12
L#1 DoublesJodi Rhodes / Melissa Grether vs Lois Dosky / Anne Hunnell6-7, 0-4
W#2 DoublesJudy Barbao / Gina Urwin vs Jane Heath / Ann Leithauser7-5, 3-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacey Royer / Amy Rupp vs Kathleen Kinnard / Linda Guyton0-6, 5-7
2025-10-29vs Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesKris Susa / Judy Barbao vs Barbara Sinclair / Susan Sugar6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMeg Perez / Gina Urwin vs Pat Rothney / Cathy Presper6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJanet Disbennett / Tammy M Jarrett vs Linda Ranck / Jennifer Willging1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-15vs OlympicLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelissa Grether / Jodi Rhodes vs Jane Heath / Anne Hunnell2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYumi Danford / Yuko Seitz vs Lois Dosky / EMILY SAALMAN4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Rupp / Stacey Royer vs Katherine Eisnaugle / Linda Guyton6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-08vs Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Barbao / Kris Susa vs Cindy Benedict / Pat Rothney6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMeg Perez / Yuko Seitz vs Janine Kiser / Linda Ranck3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesYumi Danford / Janet Disbennett vs Shelley Finley / Jennifer Willging6-2, 6-0
2025-09-24vs OlympicLost 12
L#1 DoublesKris Susa / Judy Barbao vs Anne Hunnell / Lois Dosky2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Grether / Jodi Rhodes vs Ann Leithauser / Jane Heath1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMeg Perez / Tammy M Jarrett vs Martha Pfeifer / EMILY SAALMAN2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL Adult 55&Over Women 8.0 Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Jodi Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.83
Kris Susa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.81
Judy Barbao
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.79
Gina Urwin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Yumi Danford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Amy Rupp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Meg Perez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.61
Tammy M Jarrett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Yuko Seitz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Melissa Grether
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Janet Disbennett
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.44
Stacey Royer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Fujiko Itabashi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yumi Danford + Gina Urwin11556% games+7.4% vs expected
Janet Disbennett + Kris Susa19661% games+6.7% vs expected
Janet Disbennett + Judy Barbao9360% games+4.8% vs expected
Tammy M Jarrett + Yumi Danford8157% games+4.6% vs expected
Gina Urwin + Yuko Seitz17357% games+4.6% vs expected
Janet Disbennett + Gina Urwin5555% games+4.5% vs expected
Kris Susa + Judy Barbao1083658% games+3.9% vs expected
Yumi Danford + Fujiko Itabashi4356% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jodi Rhodes
268W–138L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
Kris Susa
336W–167L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
Judy Barbao
233W–122L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Gina Urwin
170W–132L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Yumi Danford
138W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Amy Rupp
178W–172L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Meg Perez
90W–92L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
Tammy M Jarrett
65W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Yuko Seitz
151W–101L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Melissa Grether
154W–130L career · 6 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Janet Disbennett
186W–93L career · 6 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Stacey Royer
102W–202L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Fujiko Itabashi
167W–115L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.