Teams

SGV No Drama Llamas-Abadzheva-Flint Canyon/SU2

2024 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesIrina Abadzheva / Lorna Kim vs Xiaochun Wang / Theona Zhordania6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRebecca Stokes / Kristin McQueen vs Daniela Chung / Jennifer Lee2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRuth McNulty / Carla Denker vs Roseann DeRosa / Claudia Ibarra1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesLorna Kim / Danielle Perrigue vs Jennifer Miller / Shaheen Plunier6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAni Aratounians / Antoinette Lessuk vs Jami Johnson / Kelly Hawkes7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Denker / Ruth McNulty vs Aydee Martinez / Geneva Roe2-6, 1-6
2024-06-02vs SGV Dare Doubles-Hofstad-WN/SULost 13
L#1 DoublesDanielle Boyce / Danielle Perrigue vs Jina Lee / Lauren Koenig6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesIrina Abadzheva / Susan Yu vs Mary Chau / Cara Hofstad6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCarla Denker vs Karen Beutler3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAni Aratounians / Rebecca Stokes vs Ronalyn Raymundo / Ying Li6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesIrina Abadzheva / Cindi Carter vs Stephanie Perry / Katie Tong6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin McQueen / Rebecca Stokes vs Aram Hamidi / Sharon Li6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesHolly Wolfle Hall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAntoinette Lessuk / Ruth McNulty vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKristin McQueen / Ani Aratounians vs Ashley Parker / Laura Laun6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesIrina Abadzheva / Carla Denker vs Valiere Byrnes / Susan Relihan6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDanielle Perrigue vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesDanielle Boyce / Kristin McQueen vs Darlene Scott / Emily Taylor6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesIrina Abadzheva vs Diana Rochford6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Wolfle Hall / Carla Denker vs Janna Conner-Niclaes / Elizabeth Hall6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRuth McNulty / Antoinette Lessuk vs Lisa Daley / Sharon Spangler6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesKristin McQueen / Irina Abadzheva vs Stacey Iwata / Lorene Miller2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAni Aratounians / Rebecca Stokes vs Angelica Ramos / Katrina Leong4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCarla Denker vs Quynh Nghiem6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHolly Wolfle Hall / Antoinette Lessuk vs Marites Killion / Kathy Wilkinson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Irina Abadzheva
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Susan Yu
published
3.79
Tess de Los Reyes
published
3.77
Penapa Frick
published
3.73
Danielle Perrigue
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.70
Lorna Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Rebecca Stokes
published
3.69
Cindi Carter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Joanne Kim
published
3.49
Kristin McQueen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.36
Holly Wolfle Hall
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Ani Aratounians
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.26
Antoinette Lessuk
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Carla Denker
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Ruth McNulty
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antoinette Lessuk + Carla Denker211457% games+8.7% vs expected
Irina Abadzheva + Cindi Carter9457% games+7.0% vs expected
Kristin McQueen + Irina Abadzheva13856% games+3.7% vs expected
Irina Abadzheva + Danielle Perrigue14854% games+2.6% vs expected
Holly Wolfle Hall + Antoinette Lessuk101449% games+2.0% vs expected
Danielle Perrigue + Cindi Carter6551% games+0.3% vs expected
Irina Abadzheva + Susan Yu8358% games+0.1% vs expected
Lorna Kim + Kristin McQueen141252% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Irina Abadzheva
234W–146L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
4.03
Susan Yu
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Tess de Los Reyes
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Penapa Frick
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Danielle Perrigue
98W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Lorna Kim
210W–162L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Rebecca Stokes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Cindi Carter
150W–114L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Joanne Kim
8W–16L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Kristin McQueen
208W–189L career · 8 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Holly Wolfle Hall
67W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.36
4
Ani Aratounians
73W–121L career · 4 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Antoinette Lessuk
164W–156L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Carla Denker
158W–132L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Ruth McNulty
67W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.