Teams

Harrison/GHS/LRAC

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 1 League · 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-19vs Jeter/LR/CCLRLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Baptist / Emma Gean vs Mary Rhoades / Meghan Collins6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesBecky Sherman vs Claire Doshier6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAMY YATES / Jennifer Quilao vs Alexis Freeman / Mary Way5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesCatherine Gonzalez vs Whitney Ewersmann2-6, 3-6
2026-03-15vs Jeter/LR/CCLRLost 14
L#1 DoublesBecky Sherman / Meritt Harrison vs Alexis Freeman / Jenny Walls5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Quilao vs Whitney Ewersmann4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Klug / Anita Bucur vs Mary Rhoades / Meghan Collins6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesEden Raines vs Claire Doshier2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Baptist / Tamara McColey vs Marcie Jeter / Lauren Breaux4-6, 2-6
2026-03-05vs Jedlicka/LR/RebWon 40
W#1 DoublesAustynn Crocker / AMY YATES vs Andrea Sellew / Kati Beth Lewis6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEden Raines vs Marjorie Rogers6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMeritt Harrison / Jennifer Baptist vs Tiffani Jedlicka / Courtney Newell6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTamara McColey / Jennifer Quilao vs Dana Rodriguez / Hannah Heffernan6-1, 6-4
2026-03-01vs Jedlicka/LR/RebWon 41
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Klug / Sara Mitchell vs Jenni Orahood / Dana Rodriguez6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEden Raines vs Christian Lenderman6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMeritt Harrison / Shanti Camp vs Jacquelyn Harrison / Colleen Youngdahl4-6, 6-5
W#2 SinglesOlivia Gaston vs Courtney Newell6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Baptist / AMY YATES vs Courtney Jones / Meredith Reddmann6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-26vs Jeter/LR/CCLRWon 41
W#1 DoublesJennifer Baptist / Austynn Crocker vs Marcie Jeter / Cameron Hafner6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesEden Raines vs Whitney Ewersmann4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Quilao / Anita Bucur vs Jenny Walls / Jessie McLarty6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesOlivia Gaston vs Ashley Hight6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSara Mitchell / Emma Gean vs Kathryn Peacock / Shemeko Corbin6-1, 6-1
2026-02-18vs Jedlicka/LR/RebWon 41
W#1 DoublesBecky Sherman / Olivia Gaston vs Jenni Orahood / Colleen Youngdahl4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEden Raines vs Tiffani Jedlicka6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMeritt Harrison / Jennifer Quilao vs Olivia Fisher / Marjorie Rogers6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMartha Malek vs Hannah Heffernan2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAustynn Crocker / Shanti Camp vs Andrea Sellew / Jacquelyn Harrison6-1, 5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jeter/LR/CCLR5123717199
2Harrison/GHS/LRAC42181226245
3Jedlicka/LR/Reb0642653322

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Anita Bucur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.50
Suzanne Klug
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.45
Emma Gean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.34
Austynn Crocker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.32
Becky Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.27
Eden Raines
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.23
Olivia Gaston
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Meritt Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.07
Tamara McColey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Jennifer Baptist
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.04
AMY YATES
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.89
Jennifer Quilao
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Catherine Gonzalez
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Martha Malek
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Shanti Camp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meritt Harrison + Anita Bucur314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anita Bucur
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.53
Suzanne Klug
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.50
Emma Gean
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Austynn Crocker
12W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Becky Sherman
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Eden Raines
12W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Olivia Gaston
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Meritt Harrison
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Tamara McColey
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.07
Jennifer Baptist
9W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
4.5
AMY YATES
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.04
Jennifer Quilao
35W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.89
Catherine Gonzalez
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Martha Malek
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shanti Camp
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.