Teams

WO-Lamers

2021 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-03-27vs RAIN-MayLost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Socia / Yancey Haas vs Gary Wills / Crystal May5-7, 0-6
2021-03-20vs BURK-BurnetteWon 20
W#1 DoublesYancey Haas / Agustin Rodriguez vs Yvonne Burnette / Mark Hudson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Elles / Anne Elles vs Francine Durbin / Larry Shaia3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-02-20vs WW-RacelisWon 20
W#2 DoublesScott Elles / Anne Elles vs Jim Fraser / Jennifer White6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesYancey Haas / Roland Vetter vs Donna Bearman / Brandon Covey5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-01-23vs CCV-ReifsniderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Elles / Anne Elles vs John Reifsnider Jr / Donna Butler5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesYancey Haas / Roland Vetter vs Kate Beckler / Patrick Toohers5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-01-16vs ACAC-StephensLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Elles / Jim Gregory vs Jeanette Kim / David Aschheim3-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Laura Granger
published 4.5
3.92
Peyton Curdts
published
3.85
Anne Elles
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Yancey Haas
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.34
Roland Vetter
published
3.33
William Waddell
published
3.21
Kelly Gregory
published
3.13
John Port
published
3.11
Meredith Miles
published
3.10
Jenefer Williams
published
2.89
Jim Gregory
published
2.54
Scott Elles
published
Tim Socia
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Laura Granger
131W–99L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.92
Peyton Curdts
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Anne Elles
147W–130L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Yancey Haas
166W–100L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Roland Vetter
16W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
William Waddell
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%89%10%
3.33
Kelly Gregory
13W–15L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
John Port
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Meredith Miles
10W–7L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jenefer Williams
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jim Gregory
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
Scott Elles
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
2.54
Tim Socia
4W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.