Teams

Team Bellone

2023 Coppermine Tri-Level 18 & Over · Coppermine Tri Level Women 4.0,3.5,3.0 Day League

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-15vs Team FlahertyWon 10
W#3 DoublesRebecca Williams / Nikki Alworth vs Steffie Cannella Beck / Molly Sullivan6-3, 6-2
2023-11-08vs Team FlahertySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnastasia Nardangeli / Aileen Prior vs Terri Mrozinski / Tina Holmes2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMartha Whitty / Catherine Gearhart vs Steffie Cannella Beck / Heather Chilcot6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-01vs Team VisseringLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarie Beattie / Julie Snavely vs Kimberly Ford / Maneesha Ahluwalia0-6, 1-6
2023-10-18vs Team FlahertyWon 20
W#2 DoublesPatricia Mutascio / Anastasia Nardangeli vs Tracy Flaherty / Sanghee Lee6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCatherine Gearhart / Martha Whitty vs Steffie Cannella Beck / Molly Sullivan6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-11vs Team FlahertySplit 11
L#1 DoublesHolly Hoenes / Aileen Prior vs Terri Mrozinski / Candace Marshall6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNikki Alworth / Catherine Gearhart vs Heather Chilcot / Christine Lee6-2, 6-2
2023-10-04vs Team VisseringLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia Mutascio / Julie Snavely vs Maneesha Ahluwalia / Kimberly Ford3-6, 2-6
2023-09-27vs Team PreisendorferSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAileen Prior / Holly Hoenes vs Tina Holmes / Terri Mrozinski4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Kim-Ripley / Nikki Alworth vs Christine Lee / Jennifer Rauhofer5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Tri Level Women 4.0,3.5,3.0 Day League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Aileen Prior
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.44
Jessica Walsh
published
3.34
Patricia Mutascio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Nikki Alworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Julie Snavely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Kelly Bellone
published
2.90
Joy Kirk
published
2.89
Martha Whitty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Robertson
published
Nicole Conkling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Snavely + Patricia Mutascio41047% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aileen Prior
47W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.30
Jessica Walsh
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Patricia Mutascio
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Nikki Alworth
32W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Julie Snavely
35W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Kelly Bellone
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Joy Kirk
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Martha Whitty
64W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
Karen Robertson
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Conkling
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.