Teams

5-CCouto-HR

2022 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-21vs 6-KPollak-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesMary Feger vs Roberta Hadley6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLauren Bolger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-12vs 3-SEasterling-HVCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesMary Feger vs Paulina Salerno6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJulie Spearman vs Jane Waters6-1, 6-0
2022-07-07vs 1-ELinnander-SVCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJulie Spearman vs Tiffany Langino5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCarrie Couto vs Sallie Nowacek4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-05vs 2-HRoss-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesLauren Bolger vs Valerie Acre1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesCarrie Couto vs Justyne Ross2-6, 3-6
2022-06-30vs 1-ELinnander-SVCLost 01
L#2 SinglesJulie Spearman vs Eve Hammett1-6, 6-7
2022-06-21vs 6-KPollak-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesMary Feger vs Anna Brown6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJulie Spearman vs Kathryn Pollak7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-14vs 3-SEasterling-HVCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesMary Feger vs Alana Argersinger6-0, 6-2
2022-06-07vs 2-HRoss-ENOLost 03
L#1 SinglesLauren Bolger vs Carolyn Lee1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMary Feger vs Justyne Ross5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesCarrie Couto vs Beth O'Donnell2-6, 1-6
2022-05-31vs 4-CChambers-DFCLost 02
L#1 SinglesJulie Spearman vs Chanel Chambers3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCarrie Couto vs Susie Post-Rust1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Mary Feger
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.83
Julie Spearman
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
Lauren Bolger
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.66
Carrie Couto
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.58
Atsuko Duncan
published 4
3.11
Jaime Parker
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Feger + Carrie Couto171354% games+3.0% vs expected
Julie Spearman + Carrie Couto12759% games+2.6% vs expected
Mary Feger + Julie Spearman8363% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Feger
126W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Julie Spearman
168W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Lauren Bolger
94W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Carrie Couto
163W–176L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Atsuko Duncan
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Jaime Parker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.