Teams

Sonterra Spitfires

2025 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKDAY WOMEN · 3.0 Women Monday

22 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Kim Bergeron
published
3.09
Shelbi Spears
published
3.08
Cailey Parrott
published 3
2.96
Cindy Berman
published 3
2.86
Taylor Silver
published
2.86
Lorin Sledge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Cayle Myers
published 3
2.81
Casey Beiland
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Susan Hennessey
published
2.75
Jordan Funk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Marisol Acevedo
published
2.70
Alexandra Ridings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
2.66
2.61
Adrianne Yantis
published 3
2.46
Laura Hobbs
published
2.30
Samantha Wade
published
2.29
Teresa Ogrady
published
2.23
Ji Ae Ahn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Edith Ausburn
published
Robyn Justice
published
Suzanne Stricker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Funk + Lorin Sledge5169% games+22.4% vs expected
Kim Bergeron + Jordan Funk314 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Funk + Casey Beiland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Bergeron
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Shelbi Spears
20W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Cailey Parrott
15W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Cindy Berman
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Taylor Silver
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Lorin Sledge
17W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%1%99%
2.86
3
Cayle Myers
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Casey Beiland
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Susan Hennessey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Jordan Funk
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%4%96%
2.75
Marisol Acevedo
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Alexandra Ridings
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
ANA LUISA MARTINEZ
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Allison Mansfield
3W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Adrianne Yantis
3W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Laura Hobbs
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Samantha Wade
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
Teresa Ogrady
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Ji Ae Ahn
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Edith Ausburn
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robyn Justice
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Stricker
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.