Teams

Dominique/40's/3.0/FAC Night

2026 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Doyle/40's/3.0/PAC Night802938161
2Freeman/40's/3.0/NC Night53161633272
3Dominique/40's/3.0/FAC Night44161638279
4Higbee/40's/3.0/PAC Night35122045289
5Naquin/40's/3.0/BC Night0872552346

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Diane Navoy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Allison Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Diane Satter
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.44
Angelique Nicotri
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published 2.5
Fran Dominique
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Gail Miller
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Jennifer Harty
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Jenny Vitellaro
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Klara-Marie Bartels
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Rita Rebouche
usually #1 Doubles 65%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
SHELLY GALLARDO
usually #2 Doubles 49%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Susan Bullock
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Tracey Kern
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SHELLY GALLARDO + Rita Rebouche2539% gamesnot enough data
Gail Miller + Diane Navoy3353% gamesnot enough data
Gail Miller + Diane Satter1440% gamesnot enough data
Susan Bullock + SHELLY GALLARDO033 matchesnot enough data
Klara-Marie Bartels + Angelique Nicotri303 matchesnot enough data
Rita Rebouche + Diane Navoy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Navoy
13W–18L career · 25 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Allison Harrison
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Diane Satter
10W–27L career · 11 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
2.5
Angelique Nicotri
11W–12L career · 20 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Fran Dominique
27W–26L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gail Miller
24W–34L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Harty
4W–23L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jenny Vitellaro
20W–28L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Klara-Marie Bartels
11W–8L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rita Rebouche
12W–23L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO
12W–49L career · 41 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Bullock
17W–41L career · 40 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracey Kern
18W–22L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.