Teams

Brody/Meersman #2

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Combined

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-18vs All Mixed Up (Shouldis)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDieter Bareiss / Kelly Rost vs Briana Bostick / Brett Miller3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStuart Presson / Lucy Nandy vs Mary Miksell / Ryan Miksell4-6, 2-6
2023-07-11vs MeersmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesRick Freedman / Stefanie Brody vs Brendan Kelly / Joanne Sumner2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDieter Bareiss / Cara Artman vs Zane Logan / Madison Meersman2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStuart Presson / Sarah Pegg vs Alexander Smith / Allison Mathias1-6, 1-6
2023-06-20vs All Mixed Up (Shouldis)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBen Shanker / Sarah Pegg vs Samuel Spencer / Jamie Hansen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRick Freedman / Cara Artman vs Briana Bostick / Thomas Bostick0-6, 1-6
2023-06-13vs MeersmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesDustin Morgan / Lucy Nandy vs Azher Sameer / Allison Mathias6-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesKelly Rost / Rick Freedman vs Elizabeth Bauer / Brendan Kelly3-6, 1-6
2023-05-30vs All Mixed Up (Shouldis)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Rost / Dieter Bareiss vs Briana Bostick / Thomas Bostick3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBen Shanker / Stefanie Brody vs Eauclaire Caradine Shelby / Brett Miller2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-05-23vs MeersmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesBen Shanker / Cara Artman vs Azher Sameer / Elizabeth Bauer0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrandon Reinkensmeyer / Stefanie Brody vs Alexander Smith / Sirina Thompson1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStuart Presson / Sarah Pegg vs Brian Kearns / Lauren Shade1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1All Mixed Up (Shouldis)5114410104
2Meersman3310816138
3Brody/Meersman #21531532205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Cara Artman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Kelly Rost
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Dieter Bareiss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.20
Sarah Pegg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.09
Lucy Nandy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Madison Meersman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stefanie Brody
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cara Artman
67W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Kelly Rost
41W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Dieter Bareiss
16W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Sarah Pegg
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
2.20
Lucy Nandy
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.09
Madison Meersman
15W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Stefanie Brody
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.