Teams

Sweeney

2022 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-22vs B&B BuddiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoi Remoll / Diane Sweeney vs Tami Burt / Karen Broujos6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-13vs 55NetchixSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Jane Evans / Joi Remoll vs Deborah Pugh / Dorothy Cole6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHelen Patterson / Donna Worthington vs Jeannie Park / Joan Ferrell7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-22vs The Seasoned Vicious VolliesLost 01
L#2 DoublesPamela Cahouet / Donna Worthington vs Jamaine Chisholm / Mae King6-7, 2-6
2022-05-18vs B&B BuddiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Worthington / Michelle Reagle vs Grace Schneider / Helen Krone6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-23vs The Seasoned Vicious VolliesWon 10
W#3 DoublesSally Labella / Donna Worthington vs Daphne Fuller / Roslyn Johnson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Joi Remoll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Cindy Murphy
published 4
3.77
Karen Anderson
published
3.70
Diane Sweeney
published 4
3.70
Helen Patterson
published 4
3.65
Mary Jane Evans
published
3.38
Donna Worthington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Cameron Caskin
published 3.5
Marla Lusby
published
Paula McCarthy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Jane Evans + Diane Sweeney134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joi Remoll
144W–83L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Cindy Murphy
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Karen Anderson
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Diane Sweeney
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Helen Patterson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
Mary Jane Evans
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Donna Worthington
129W–123L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Cameron Caskin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marla Lusby
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula McCarthy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.