Teams

Wtc - Camacho

2021 Broward Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-08vs Parkland - LiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJANNETH CARBALLIDO / Saverio Riccobono vs Karen Lu / BRAD TAYLOR4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMauricio Camacho / Virna Trujillo vs Amber Yan Mueller / Jian Huang6-4, 6-4
2021-03-05vs Veltri - YonghongWon 20
W#1 DoublesMauricio Camacho / Virna Trujillo vs Adolfo Salazar / Eileen Escarda6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohn Kreider / JANNETH CARBALLIDO vs Tone Lilly / Andrew Simpson6-2, 6-2
2021-02-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesMauricio Camacho / JANNETH CARBALLIDO vs Timothy Scott / Connie Rivera7-5, 7-6
2021-02-12vs Wtc - DeAndreisWon 20
W#1 DoublesMauricio Camacho / Virna Trujillo vs Roberto Palma / Maria Lanza7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJANNETH CARBALLIDO / Saverio Riccobono vs Daniela Hernandez / Alberto de la Rosa2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-02-05vs Jetc - GomezWon 10
W#1 DoublesJANNETH CARBALLIDO / Saverio Riccobono vs Alberto Hernandez / Maria Elena Rojas6-1, 6-1
2021-01-29vs Broward - Midtown/BarronWon 10
W#2 DoublesMauricio Camacho / Virna Trujillo vs Sondra Carpio / Enrique Guzman Barron Escobedo2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Catherine Land
published 4
3.67
Dana Reece
published 4
3.43
JANNETH CARBALLIDO
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Mauricio Camacho
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Saverio Riccobono
published
3.30
Virna Trujillo
published
3.26
Arnon Lopes
published 3.5
3.21
LUIS HERNANDEZ
published
3.21
Evelyn Daniels
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JANNETH CARBALLIDO + Mauricio Camacho4550% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Wilsman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Catherine Land
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Dana Reece
18W–18L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
JANNETH CARBALLIDO
147W–89L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Mauricio Camacho
156W–115L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
Saverio Riccobono
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Virna Trujillo
8W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Arnon Lopes
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
LUIS HERNANDEZ
17W–28L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Evelyn Daniels
17W–17L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.