Teams

Ki.Patrey18S4.0

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-28vs Li.Murdock18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesButton Hall vs Lindsay Murdock7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAnna Koltchagova vs Ayako Otsuka0-6, 1-6
2024-10-07vs Li.Murdock18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesButton Hall vs Erin Farleigh6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAnna Koltchagova vs Erika Grenier0-6, 4-6
2024-10-01vs Li.Murdock18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesButton Hall vs Lindsay Murdock4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-23vs Er.McAllister18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesButton Hall vs Molly Walker4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-02vs Er.McAllister18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesButton Hall vs Sheila Riley6-4, 7-5
W#3 SinglesNancy Pack vs Nikki DAmbrose6-1, 6-2
2024-08-26vs Li.Murdock18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesButton Hall vs Erin Farleigh3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKimberly Patrey vs Anna Kooper3-6, 0-6
2024-08-12vs Er.McAllister18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNancy Pack vs Amber Richardson6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAnna Koltchagova vs Nikki DAmbrose1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Allison Graves
published 4.5
4.02
Nancy Pack
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.84
Carolyn Lee
published 4
3.63
Elise Hamilton
published 3.5
3.60
Kimberly Patrey
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.60
Button Hall
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 4
3.51
Kristin Rice
published
3.44
Anna Koltchagova
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Pack + Kimberly Patrey3256% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Pack + Allison Graves224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Pack + Anna Koltchagova303 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Patrey + Button Hall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Graves
38W–20L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Nancy Pack
296W–90L career · 4 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Carolyn Lee
35W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.84
3.5
Elise Hamilton
38W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.63
4
Kimberly Patrey
238W–186L career · 1 line in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Button Hall
223W–223L career · 8 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kristin Rice
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Anna Koltchagova
182W–161L career · 3 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.