Teams

Creighton Farms - Mowry 3.5

2025 Loudoun Singles · Loudoun Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-22vs Fulkerson - Stoneleigh 3.5 SinglesSplit 11
L#2 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Aldona Petraitis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Elisabeth Gaubinger6-4, 6-2
2025-10-15vs WilsonWon 10
W#2 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Maryam Aranee6-2, 6-4
2025-10-03vs McManusSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Jeannie Matteson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAllison Quinly vs Eleanor McManus6-0, 6-3
2025-10-01vs McMullenWon 10
W#3 SinglesAllison Quinly vs Margaret Amy Flaherty6-1, 6-1
2025-09-26vs McMullenSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Gretchen Leitch4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesStacy Mowry vs Kimberly Murray6-2, 3-1
2025-09-24vs Fulkerson - Stoneleigh 3.5 SinglesLost 02
L#2 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Maureen Fulkerson7-6, 4-5
L#3 SinglesKelly Rowley vs Elisabeth Gaubinger6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-18vs WilsonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStacy Mowry vs Yasmeen Sana Warsi6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAllison Quinly vs Peggah Wilson6-0, 7-5
2025-09-10vs McManusSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Hannah Auyang7-6, 0-4
W#3 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Eleanor McManus6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Stacy Mowry
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Allison Quinly
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Jamie Davis
published
3.33
Carolyn Mccarter
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Erin Burnett
published
3.30
Kelly Rowley
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Afsoun Semsar
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.98
Rebecca Norman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Mowry + Allison Quinly7166% games+13.6% vs expected
Kelly Rowley + Stacy Mowry9062% games+10.8% vs expected
Kelly Rowley + Carolyn Mccarter4260% games+10.6% vs expected
Carolyn Mccarter + Erin Burnett404 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Rowley + Rebecca Norman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stacy Mowry
86W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
3.5
Allison Quinly
50W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Jamie Davis
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Mccarter
89W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Erin Burnett
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Kelly Rowley
65W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3
Afsoun Semsar
44W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Rebecca Norman
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.