Teams

1-DStefan-HS

2022 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-11vs 4-TBuckley-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Craig Demarest vs Bob Stocking / Doug Kopec5-7, 5-7
2022-05-04vs 2-RGildehaus-YMCALost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Chris Konvalinka vs Stephen Rothchild / Vincent Illiano6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVan Blalock / Jeff Rose vs Steven Rochkind / Hayes Hofler5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-04-27vs 3-SClark-EnoWon 10
W#3 DoublesVan Blalock / Mark Macdonald vs Brian Bornstein / Robert Lacy3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-20vs 4-TBuckley-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Craig Demarest vs Wendell Gilland / Timothy Buckley3-6, 6-7
2022-04-13vs 2-RGildehaus-YMCAWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Konvalinka / Eric Lindblom vs Ed Holub / David Holub6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2022-04-12vs 2-RGildehaus-YMCALost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Konvalinka / Eric Lindblom vs Ed Holub / David Holub6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-06vs 3-SClark-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Demarest / Eric Lindblom vs Brian Bornstein / Robert Lacy6-3, 6-2
2022-03-30vs 4-TBuckley-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Craig Demarest vs Stephen Ryan / Bob Stocking3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Rose / Van Blalock vs Mark Farber / Gary Sobel3-6, 0-6
2022-03-02vs 3-SClark-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Dave Thomas vs Glen Hacker / Frank Veno4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Eric Lindblom
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.10
Scott Hartman
published
3.06
David Stefan
published 3.5
3.04
Mark Macdonald
published
2.95
Dave Thomas
published 3
2.82
2.63
Van Blalock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.61
Andy Jones
published 3
Chris Konvalinka
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Thomas + Andy Jones1541% games−1.5% vs expected
Dave Thomas + Scott Hartman123 matchesnot enough data
David Stefan + Scott Hartman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Lindblom
122W–60L career · 15 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
Scott Hartman
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
David Stefan
3W–15L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Mark Macdonald
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Dave Thomas
34W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Darrell Bradfield
7W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
2.5
Van Blalock
20W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%16%84%
2.63
3
Andy Jones
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Chris Konvalinka
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.