Teams

Meekins - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Combo 18 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-18vs Link - RS HardWon 20
W#1 DoublesXiaobo Dong / Robert Landt vs Percy Rojas / Zach Pohlmann6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Haarala / Matthew Meekins vs Jason Twigg / Jody Link6-2, 6-1
2025-11-20vs Link - RS HardWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoseph Tegenkamp / John Haarala vs Bradford Grimmel / Rick Greene6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJack Bellah / Matthew Meekins vs Jody Link / Zach Pohlmann6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Landt / Joe Burch vs Mike Esmonde / Bud Lawrence6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-30vs Link - RS HardWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Worley / Jack Bellah vs Bradford Grimmel / Bud Lawrence6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoseph Tegenkamp / Xiaobo Dong vs Jonathan Llanera / Brian Young3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Landt / Chris Kelly vs Zach Pohlmann / Rick Greene4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Combo 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Ryan Worley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.04
Joseph Tegenkamp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
John Haarala
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Collin Crowson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Robert Landt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Xiaobo Dong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jack Bellah
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Joe Burch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Meekins
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Xiaobo Dong + Joseph Tegenkamp4165% gamesnot enough data
Xiaobo Dong + Jack Bellah303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Worley
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.09
Joseph Tegenkamp
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
John Haarala
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Collin Crowson
20W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Robert Landt
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
Xiaobo Dong
24W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Jack Bellah
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Burch
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Meekins
19W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.