Teams

HH55/Giuliani/SPCC

Adult 55 & Over · Women 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDebbie Blohm / Mary Seip vs Annamarie Lang / Jayne Parker5-7, 2-6
2022-07-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbie Blohm / Mary Seip vs Mary Rocks / Brenda Shields0-6, 4-6
2022-07-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDebbie Blohm / Mary Seip vs Lori Dowling / Paula Smith7-6, 3-5, 0-1
2022-06-21Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDebbie Blohm / Mary Seip vs Takako Sachse / Katie McGuire6-7, 0-6
2022-06-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIngrid Meenen / Diane Pion vs Floy Pease / Beth Ann Schipani3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesIngrid Meenen / Diane Pion vs Amy Morgan / Kristine Santerini6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Carol Zack
published 3.5
3.35
Diane Pion
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Kyoko Queen
published
3.35
Pat Giuliani
published
3.31
Gail Bisbee
published 3.5
3.24
Donna Strauss
published 3.5
3.22
Debbie Blohm
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jean Duffy
published
Kelly Coppolino
published
Mary Boylston
published
Melanie Beckler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Giuliani + Gail Bisbee7454% games+3.6% vs expected
Pat Giuliani + Carol Zack3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Zack
22W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Diane Pion
47W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Kyoko Queen
17W–25L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
Pat Giuliani
40W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Gail Bisbee
31W–25L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Donna Strauss
31W–52L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Debbie Blohm
49W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Jean Duffy
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Coppolino
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Boylston
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melanie Beckler
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.