Teams

CCV-Avery

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-19vs MAC-TalamoWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmmett Avery / Kirsti Goodwin vs Byron Roberts / Lidia Cousins2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-18vs BURK-BucklesLost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Morris / Rick Morris vs April Buckles / Bret McFee6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-03-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Spotty Robins vs Andrea Hill / Jay Honse3-6, 4-6
2023-02-26vs WO-BlackwoodLost 01
L#2 DoublesPreston Dillard / Kirsti Goodwin vs Terence Blackwood / Ingrid Hale2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-19vs WW-JesseeWon 10
W#3 DoublesRick Morris / Suzanne Morris vs Ashley Sommardahl / James McClees6-4, 6-1
2023-01-21vs MTC-CrewsLost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Morris / Suzanne Morris vs Patrick Survello / Noelle Crews1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Ashley Millen
published 4
3.65
Alison Avery
published 4
3.63
3.61
Scott Harrison
published
3.59
Anne Henry
published 4.5
3.50
Jonathan Henry
published
3.50
Suzanne Morris
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
David Campbell
published 4
3.41
Nathan Knight
published
3.18
Emmett Avery
published
3.04
Spotty Robins
published
3.04
Connell Mullins
published 3.5
3.01
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Levy
published
Matthew Chriss
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Millen
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Alison Avery
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Cary Campbell-Knight
17W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.63
Scott Harrison
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.61
4.5
Anne Henry
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
Jonathan Henry
29W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Suzanne Morris
27W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
David Campbell
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
Nathan Knight
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Emmett Avery
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Spotty Robins
23W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Connell Mullins
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jennifer Levy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Chriss
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.