Teams

UPTA75A/Uhlig/Keowee Key

75 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-13vs GSTL75/Hetzer/INDWon 21
L#1 DoublesLarry Berridge / Kenneth Uhlig vs Robert Stone / Joey Singleton4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDean Twedt / Larry Wingard vs Robert Price / Conrad Hetzer6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLowell Weaner / Philip Epstein vs Fernando Astorga / James Campbell6-2, 7-5
2024-10-12vs HHTL75/LindseyWon 21
W#1 DoublesKenneth Uhlig / Larry Berridge vs Brian Fatzinger / Donald Benjamin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLarry Wingard / Dean Twedt vs Eric Bretzel / Konrad Tuchscherer6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPhilip Epstein / Lowell Weaner vs Larry Fisher / Greg Geelhood5-7, 0-6
2024-10-12vs LATA75/Crosby/MWWon 21
W#1 DoublesKenneth Uhlig / Larry Berridge vs Brooks Rogers / Richard Fallon6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDean Twedt / Larry Wingard vs George Freeman / William Taylor7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMike McKenzie / Ralph Rowe vs Jonathan Lipsi / Randy Watts2-6, 0-6
2024-10-11vs LCTA75/NemesLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenneth Uhlig / Larry Berridge vs Bernie Bell / Hank Adorno6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMike McKenzie / Ralph Rowe vs Frank Grubb / Leon Geller1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDean Twedt / Larry Wingard vs Louis Weinstein / Dick Nemes3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Dean Twedt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Kenneth Uhlig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Larry Berridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Larry Wingard
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lowell Weaner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mike McKenzie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Philip Epstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ralph Rowe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Wingard + Dean Twedt5263% games+8.7% vs expected
Kenneth Uhlig + Larry Berridge6548% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dean Twedt
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Kenneth Uhlig
20W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Larry Berridge
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
Larry Wingard
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Lowell Weaner
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike McKenzie
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Philip Epstein
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ralph Rowe
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.