Teams

HRCA-N BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-15vs BM BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Capps / John Dungey vs Eliot Payson / Ian Campbell6-3, 6-1
2025-07-08vs BCST REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Dungey / Robert White vs Jeff Todd / Tom Hannigan6-3, 6-4
2025-06-17vs KC-CC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Capps / John Dungey vs Michael Hursta / Jeff Eversman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs BM BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesJohn Dungey vs Herbert Dehaas0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
John Dungey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Robert White
published
Aaron Fisch
published 3.5
Anthony Cataldo
published 3.5
Chad McCann
published 3.5
3.06
Douglas SIMMONS
published
Gary Capps
published
Justin Marshall
published
Kirk Gray
published
Michael Deminski
published
Nolan Johnson
published
Stephan Termaat
published
Warren Olsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Deminski + Robert White044 matchesnot enough data
John Dungey + Robert White134 matchesnot enough data
Warren Olsen + Chad McCann134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Deminski + Aaron Fisch123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Deminski + Stephan Termaat033 matchesnot enough data
Aaron Fisch + Chad McCann213 matchesnot enough data
Gary Capps + John Dungey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
John Dungey
69W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Robert White
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Aaron Fisch
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Anthony Cataldo
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chad McCann
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Douglas SIMMONS
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Gary Capps
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Justin Marshall
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kirk Gray
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Deminski
1W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nolan Johnson
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephan Termaat
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Warren Olsen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.