Teams

Penn Pals

2023 Mixed 18 and Over League · 9.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.43 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-03-19vs Mike's 9.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesDeb Rinaldi / Ralph Gorgoglione vs Ruby Matsui / Ricky Tobita7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMalorie Murakami / Rick Camp vs Petra Dupont / Curt DeCrinis7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelissa Nickens / Justin Locke vs Princess Ramos / Charlie Crandall6-1, 6-4
2023-03-18vs Mike's 9.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesDeb Rinaldi / Shaun Thayer vs Lori Sakakihara-Chavarria / Dane Luna2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Christopher / Justin Locke vs Karen Sullivan / Charlie Crandall6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCaroline Gammie / Chan Ly vs Ruby Matsui / Jon Kinoshita6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Chan Ly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Deb Rinaldi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Melissa Nickens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Shaun Thayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Caroline Gammie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Rachel Christopher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Andrew Yoon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Hana Yoshikawa
published
Justin Locke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Malorie Murakami
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Kinoshita
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Malorie Murakami + Justin Locke4162% gamesnot enough data
Malorie Murakami + Andrew Yoon224 matchesnot enough data
Hana Yoshikawa + Andrew Yoon303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chan Ly
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Deb Rinaldi
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Melissa Nickens
149W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Shaun Thayer
71W–35L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Caroline Gammie
72W–42L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Rachel Christopher
69W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
27%72%<1%
4.08
4
Andrew Yoon
56W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Hana Yoshikawa
26W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Justin Locke
52W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Malorie Murakami
101W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Kinoshita
29W–56L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.