Teams

Carefree, Jones

2021 Tri Level Men 4.5 · 4.5,4.0,3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.89 / LONG ISLAND REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-12-14vs Carefree,FattizziWon 30
W#1 DoublesTomas Kukla / Christopher Wolfe vs Allan Rosner / Djonvi Santos4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher DiMino / Vladimir Salomon vs Joseph Bullaro / Brendan Moser6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAndrew Lapierre / Jean Wesh vs Cesar Oballe / Adam Moramarco6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2020-11-23vs Point Set, Low/AzagarLost 12
W#1 DoublesDan Jones / John Ferrari vs Yassine Azagar / Terry Kossegi6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Leibowitz / Gary Spitz vs Brian Dulberg / Jeff Kee3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGaddy Cohen / Ash Pahuja vs Jung Park / Michael Tarlow5-7, 3-6
2020-11-16vs Carefree,FattizziLost 12
L#1 DoublesDan Jones / John Ferrari vs Casey Schnabel / Christopher Chan4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesVladimir Salomon / Christopher DiMino vs Jason Pessel / Paul Epstein6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesShaun Willis / Jean Wesh vs Martin Chow / James Avallone6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2020-10-26vs Point Set, Low/AzagarLost 03
L#1 DoublesDan Jones / Tomas Kukla vs Terry Kossegi / Keith Mattes4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGary Spitz / Christopher DiMino vs Ian Zaslansky / Jeff Kee4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJean Wesh / Shaun Willis vs Scott Wiss / Stan Yurynets3-6, 2-6
2020-10-19vs Carefree,FattizziLost 12
L#1 DoublesTomas Kukla / Craig Handleman vs Casey Schnabel / Christopher Chan2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Leibowitz / Paras Bedmutha vs Paul Epstein / Jason Pessel1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShaun Willis / Andrew Lapierre vs Adam Moramarco / Christopher Permiceo6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2020-09-21vs Point Set, Low/AzagarWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher Wolfe / Tomas Kukla vs Terry Kossegi / RJ Narciso7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVladimir Salomon / Christopher DiMino vs Brian Dulberg / Eddie Demirci6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGaddy Cohen / Jean Wesh vs Scott Wiss / Peter Hsieh1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5,4.0,3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Craig Handleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Christopher DiMino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Dan Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Christopher Wolfe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Vladimir Salomon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Ash Pahuja
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
David Leibowitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Jean Wesh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Gaddy Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Andrew Lapierre
published
Gary Spitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Ferrari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paras Bedmutha
published
Shaun Willis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tomas Kukla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vladimir Salomon + Christopher DiMino331061% games+3.5% vs expected
Christopher Wolfe + Tomas Kukla4449% games−2.2% vs expected
John Ferrari + Dan Jones51445% games−2.8% vs expected
Christopher Wolfe + Dan Jones1739% games−8.0% vs expected
Vladimir Salomon + Christopher Wolfe7256% gamesnot enough data
Shaun Willis + Jean Wesh044 matchesnot enough data
Shaun Willis + Tomas Kukla134 matchesnot enough data
Tomas Kukla + Dan Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Craig Handleman
6W–15L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Christopher DiMino
124W–49L career · 4 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Dan Jones
54W–115L career · 3 lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
3.80
4
Christopher Wolfe
85W–104L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Vladimir Salomon
163W–161L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Ash Pahuja
20W–22L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
David Leibowitz
28W–41L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jean Wesh
76W–92L career · 4 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Gaddy Cohen
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Andrew Lapierre
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Gary Spitz
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Ferrari
25W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paras Bedmutha
6W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shaun Willis
42W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tomas Kukla
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.