Teams

OC Yorba Linda CC - Melissa

2025 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday

30 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-08vs OC Irvine Heritage - Tiffney- sun9Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelinda Chu / Aimee Firouznam vs Crosby Burke / Kathy Salter3-6, 2-6
2025-07-11vs OC HB Aces - Cheryl - Sat1130Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAimee Firouznam / Cyndi Nguyen vs Catherine Fullerton / Janna McConnell2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 30 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Cyndi Nguyen
published 4
3.80
Holly Bruning
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
3.62
Melinda Chu
published
3.60
Aimee Firouznam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Shelly Morgan
published
3.46
Emily Lee
published
3.36
Terri Holly
published
3.34
Candi Maher
published 3.5
3.27
Mischa King
published
3.26
Janell Aven
published
3.24
Sandy Swearingen
published
3.22
Valerie Armijo
published
3.20
Monica Kirby
published
3.20
Natalie St Germain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Michaela Ehrle
published
3.13
Christina Case
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Melissa McCullough
published
3.13
Sandra Patel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Nancy Montez
published
3.08
Shannon Langpap
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Sheri Kumsakul
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Nicole Reed
published
2.97
Vivian Noble
published
2.96
Sandra Barnette
published
2.94
Prim Visava
published
2.91
Sarah Huff
published
2.89
Teresa Yochum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Amee Patel
published 3
2.72
Susan Leonardi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa McCullough + Michaela Ehrle5450% games+6.4% vs expected
Sandra Barnette + Mischa King10457% games+2.8% vs expected
Christina Case + Sandra Patel61144% games+1.8% vs expected
Claudia Spaulding + Aimee Firouznam3350% games−6.5% vs expected
Melinda Chu + Emily Lee5076% gamesnot enough data
Terri Holly + Monica Kirby314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa McCullough + Sandra Patel224 matchesnot enough data
Terri Holly + Melinda Chu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cyndi Nguyen
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Holly Bruning
73W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Claudia Spaulding
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Melinda Chu
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
4
Aimee Firouznam
67W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
Shelly Morgan
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Emily Lee
25W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Terri Holly
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Candi Maher
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Mischa King
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Janell Aven
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Sandy Swearingen
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Valerie Armijo
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Monica Kirby
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Natalie St Germain
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Michaela Ehrle
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Christina Case
11W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Melissa McCullough
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Sandra Patel
13W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Nancy Montez
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Shannon Langpap
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Sheri Kumsakul
38W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Nicole Reed
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Vivian Noble
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Sandra Barnette
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Prim Visava
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.94
Sarah Huff
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
Teresa Yochum
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Amee Patel
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Susan Leonardi
9W–19L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.