Teams

CSRC RAMSEY

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Charlier Cox / Carol Young vs Margaret Hill / Lisa Fleury6-1, 6-4
2021-07-12vs FLYHS MAEGDLINWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Charlier Cox / Martha Freeman vs Lacy Utterback / Lori Mohr5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-07-05vs CSCC TAFOLLAWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Charlier Cox / Martha Freeman vs Carre Bistline / Colleen Miller6-3, 6-2
2021-06-28vs LFTCS SKINNERLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Jennifer Charlier Cox vs Dana Kennedy / Jennifer Loh4-6, 2-6
2021-06-14vs CCW BURNSWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Young / Jennifer Charlier Cox vs Margaret Hill / Lisa Bolin7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2021-06-07vs FLYHS MAEGDLINWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Charlier Cox / Cheri Ramsey vs Lori Mohr / Kristi Couture6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elizabeth Daniels
published 3.5
2.95
MARY SCOTT
published
2.85
Jennifer Charlier Cox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Cheri Ramsey
published 3
2.67
Carol Young
published 3
2.61
Patricia Poulin
published
Leonora Osborne
published
Linda Sagastume
published
Martha Freeman
published
Rosemary Partridge
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Charlier Cox + Cheri Ramsey7160% games+0.5% vs expected
Jennifer Charlier Cox + MARY SCOTT404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Daniels
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
MARY SCOTT
64W–43L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.95
3.5
Jennifer Charlier Cox
84W–69L career · 6 lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Cheri Ramsey
60W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Carol Young
17W–44L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
Patricia Poulin
30W–39L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
2.61
Leonora Osborne
7W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Sagastume
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Martha Freeman
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rosemary Partridge
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.