Teams

SD LL2 9.0 Mtn View/ Armstrong

2025 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over Summer- SD · SD

12 players · average NTRP 4.43 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesFabiola Flores / Norman Granger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-09vs SDNC 9.0 RSFTC/ BarbarieWon 10
W#2 DoublesFabiola Flores / Norman Granger vs Prentiss van Den Berg / Joseph Barbarie6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / Whitney Ginter vs Katherine Steinberg / Stuart Ridge4-6, 2-6
2025-07-12vs SD LLWX 9.0 Peninsula TC/ BowersLost 02
L#2 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / Carla Zarbo vs May Sotthivirat / Kenny Rosenberg2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGreg Lindsey / Fabiola Flores vs Valerie Tan / Eric Bowers2-6, 5-7
2025-06-28vs SDNC 9.0 RSFTC/ BarbarieLost 01
L#2 DoublesGretchen Shaffer / Joseph Barraquio vs Robin Hubbard / Jeffrey Ford6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFabiola Flores / Jamie Armstrong vs Tiffany Kellogg / Jeff Ray6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Carla Zarbo
published 4.5
4.28
Alejandro Castaneda
published 4.5
4.23
Whitney Ginter
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.19
Angie Colonna
published 4.5
4.14
Vinh Dang
published
4.13
Guadalupe Rendon
published
4.11
Gretchen Shaffer
published
4.09
Fabiola Flores
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.02
Joseph Barraquio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Greg Lindsey
published
3.92
Wender Hwang
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Norman Granger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alejandro Castaneda + Angie Colonna134 matchesnot enough data
Carla Zarbo + Joseph Barraquio213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carla Zarbo
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Alejandro Castaneda
3W–3L career · type T · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Whitney Ginter
135W–118L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Angie Colonna
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
Vinh Dang
33W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
Guadalupe Rendon
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
Gretchen Shaffer
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Fabiola Flores
125W–102L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Joseph Barraquio
100W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Greg Lindsey
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Wender Hwang
158W–79L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Norman Granger
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.