Teams

BASALT GOLD

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs GSCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Richardson / Monica Cohan vs Siri Olsen / Stacey Adams0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDenise Taylor vs Amy Roggie4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCorin Brucker / Jennifer Soho vs Anne Sale / Mary Boyd2-6, 2-6
2026-08-10vs RVR GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCorin Brucker / Ashley Richardson vs Brooke Stott / Zoe Herreid5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Cohan / Leslie Riddel vs Jill Brewer / Jamie Gooding5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RVR GOLD1030012
2AG BLUE000000
3BASALT GOLD0103638

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Denise Taylor
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Jennifer Soho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Adele Melnick
published 3.5
3.00
Ashley Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Leslie Riddel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Corin Brucker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.76
Monica Cohan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Riddel + Ashley Richardson222846% games−0.1% vs expected
Corin Brucker + Leslie Riddel134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Taylor
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Jennifer Soho
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Adele Melnick
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Ashley Richardson
41W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Leslie Riddel
34W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
3.5
Corin Brucker
39W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
Monica Cohan
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.