Teams

Marple - RCC Alley Oops

2025 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-30vs Sullivant- Baseline BeautiesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesStephanie Place / Brandy Johns vs Teresa Condon / Judy Rector6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaren Triplett / Carthina Marple vs Nancy Shepley / Tammy Tiko4-6, 7-5
2025-05-29vs Everling - LGCC 3.0 SpringWon 10
W#1 DoublesCathleen Porter / Lisa Phaneuf vs JJ Herbert / Patti Sinnen4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-20vs Belardo - Village PeopleWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Phaneuf / Cathleen Porter vs Patricia Hathaway / Alicia Burns6-1, 6-4
2025-05-01vs Haugh - StoneleighLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoy Moynihan / Carthina Marple vs Elizabeth McDonald / Melissa Haugh6-7, 4-6
2025-04-24vs Butler - Glam SlamLost 02
L#1 DoublesCathleen Porter / Lisa Phaneuf vs Shelley Winants / Stephanie Yarmosh1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCarthina Marple vs Kim Hovda0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jill Vaughan
published
3.19
Cathleen Porter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Joy Moynihan
published
2.93
2.88
Stephanie Place
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Amy Albanese
published 3
2.83
Mary Schopper
published
DeAnna Burke
published 3
2.68
Dawn Regan
published 3
2.67
Deborah Raine
published 3
2.54
Sandra Moses
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Kimberly Fulham
published
2.40
Carthina Marple
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.30
Karen Triplett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Moynihan + Sandra Moses224 matchesnot enough data
Cathleen Porter + Carthina Marple123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Vaughan
22W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Cathleen Porter
77W–80L career · 8 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Joy Moynihan
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Mary Beth Williamson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Stephanie Place
130W–213L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Amy Albanese
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Mary Schopper
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
DeAnna Burke
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dawn Regan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Deborah Raine
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Sandra Moses
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Kimberly Fulham
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Carthina Marple
50W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
Karen Triplett
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.