Teams

CPV BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs PRC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesTraci Heffron / Mayme McDonald vs Amber Jorgensen / Kristin Prosowski2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Abner vs Maureen Butler7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Miles / Kelly Shadwick vs Stephanie Gresh / Marcie Manuello1-6, 2-6
2022-07-13vs LTFC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesBritney Anderson / Katie Abner vs Shawn Blackwood / Leslie DeVilliers3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Selket Allen6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Wilson / Amy Kozlowski vs Carla Gamet / Anna Carmody2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Miles / Nanette Dahlstrom vs Leigh Dunn / Valerie Koenig1-6, 0-6
2022-07-11vs PCRK REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTraci Heffron / Mayme McDonald vs Jody Mumaugh / Anne Mills6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Katie Hanna0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Kozlowski / Elizabeth Watson vs Andrea Janke / Debra Stamatis7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKatie Abner / Nanette Dahlstrom vs Mary Ingolia / Sally Avery2-6, 3-6
2022-06-27vs VCC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesTraci Heffron / Mayme McDonald vs Kelly Kelly / Kirklyn Simonton6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Dana Henry1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBritney Anderson / Mary Lowen vs Debbie Groves / Theresa Holyer6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Kozlowski / Elizabeth Watson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-20vs HRCA REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMira Brand / Traci Heffron vs Denise Larsen / Leticia Baldwin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Kristine Maleri7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMayme McDonald / Nanette Dahlstrom vs Julie Reed / Lisa McGavern3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Wilson / Amy Kozlowski vs Kelli Lofquist / Tiffany Gerken7-5, 7-5
2022-06-13vs PCC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesTraci Heffron / Mira Brand vs Janet Perry / Ann Ripley7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Maureen Gsand4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBritney Anderson / Mary Lowen vs Julie Trent / Victoria Hostin6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Miles / Katie Abner vs Lisa Hossack / Rebecca Kobayashi6-3, 6-2
2022-06-06vs CACI GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesTraci Heffron / Mary Lowen vs Lee Silver / Susan Ham2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Karina Stevens3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Watson / Mayme McDonald vs Cherie Weaver / Holly Kortum3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Abner / Susan Miles vs Susan Cole / Elizabeth Leutwyler5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Traci Heffron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Britney Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Mayme McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Kelly Shadwick
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.44
Katie Abner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.40
Amy Kozlowski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Susan Miles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Lowen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mira Brand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nanette Dahlstrom
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mayme McDonald + Traci Heffron16361% games+4.6% vs expected
Britney Anderson + Traci Heffron16559% games+4.3% vs expected
Mayme McDonald + Britney Anderson4358% games+2.0% vs expected
Mayme McDonald + Katie Abner4459% games−1.3% vs expected
Susan Miles + Traci Heffron4156% gamesnot enough data
Nanette Dahlstrom + Susan Miles044 matchesnot enough data
Mira Brand + Susan Miles224 matchesnot enough data
Mira Brand + Traci Heffron314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Traci Heffron
171W–77L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Britney Anderson
39W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Mayme McDonald
98W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Kelly Shadwick
41W–44L career · 7 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Katie Abner
29W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Amy Kozlowski
35W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Susan Miles
41W–78L career · 4 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mary Lowen
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mira Brand
25W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nanette Dahlstrom
6W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.