← Teams

GFU-Daugherty/Robertson

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.07 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Amy Bucher
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.92
Andrea Findley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Kristen Benkstein
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Jessica Khalili
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
—
Suzie Glenn
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.47
Kana Wakamatsu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Elizabeth Domagalski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results8 ties
2022-06-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAndrea Findley / Kana Wakamatsu vs Nikki Nadig / Joanne Reardon6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Benkstein vs Carrie Willis7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Khalili / Amy Bucher vs Theresa Mallari / Sarah Petersen6-2, 6-4
2022-06-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSuzie Glenn / Chanon Ogden vs May Albano / Jennifer Simmons7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Domagalski / Jessica Khalili vs Holly Kanz / Danielle Cuenco1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCasey Cobb / Kristen Benkstein vs Sarah Carrato / Sarah Yu6-4, 6-4
2022-06-04Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Domagalski / Jessica Khalili vs Jeanette Thomas / Michaela Bancud6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChanon Ogden / Suzie Glenn vs Sally Lovett / Sally Sterling6-4, 6-3
2022-05-29Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAndrea Findley / Jessica Khalili vs Mary Green-Zwemke / Heike Droste6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzie Glenn / Kana Wakamatsu vs Loo Yah Leong / Patricia Board6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Domagalski / Amy Bucher vs Xiaolu Huang / Robin Kaukonen6-1, 6-1
2022-05-15Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSuzie Glenn / Kana Wakamatsu vs Ellen Bowman / Margaret Sivertsen6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Domagalski / Jessica Khalili vs Mary Taylor / Philippa Stasiuk7-6, 6-2
2022-05-13Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesAndrea Findley / Jessica Khalili vs Mary Elliott / Kathleen Goodfriend6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKristen Benkstein vs Tara Hendrickson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Domagalski / Amy Bucher vs Jen Woods / Jessica Miller6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSuzie Glenn / Kana Wakamatsu vs Rebecca Martinez Griffin / Deborah Naugler6-4, 6-2
2022-05-07Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesAndrea Findley / Suzie Glenn vs Mary Hlady / Shelly Perkins6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKristen Benkstein vs Lynne Gaerisch6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChanon Ogden / Amy Bucher vs Teresa Jackson / Catherine Crosby6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShamera Daugherty / Elizabeth Domagalski vs Nichole Anglin / Sara Swanborn7-5, 6-2
2022-04-10Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesJessica Khalili / Andrea Findley vs Lynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSuzie Glenn vs Sandi Bittler4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Bucher / Chanon Ogden vs Wanda Nijholt / Ren Toshié Miura7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKana Wakamatsu / Shamera Daugherty vs Carrie Fisher / Rochelle Hart6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Amy Bucher
179W–78L career
10%90%0%
4.05
4
Andrea Findley
95W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.92
4
Kristen Benkstein
132W–55L career
0%99%1%
3.83
4
Jessica Khalili
51W–22L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Suzie Glenn
47W–28L career
not enough data
—
4
Kana Wakamatsu
60W–63L career
42%58%0%
3.47
4
Elizabeth Domagalski
72W–47L career
56%44%0%
3.42

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.