Teams

The Older Team-Moreno

2021 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Carlin Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Tony Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.16
Kevin Heller
published 3.5
Results8 ties
2021-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Heller / Tony Moreno vs Marc DeSantis / Ken Nichols6-2, 6-4
2021-07-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarlin Jackson / Tony Moreno vs Max Anderson / Jordan Burns6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Heller / Tony Moreno vs Michael Cheng / Joshua Goddard6-2, 6-2
2021-07-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTony Moreno / Carlin Jackson vs Atom Fjeldsted / Brian Hughes7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarlin Jackson / Tony Moreno vs Gabriel Weaver / Zhitong Chen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Heller / Tony Moreno vs Owen Burcham / Brandon Lawrence6-4, 6-1
2021-06-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTony Moreno / Kevin Heller vs Kit Johnson / Brian Posewitz2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTony Moreno / Carlin Jackson vs Mark Tryon / Zachary Kinavey3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carlin Jackson
134W–66L career
0%99%0%
3.77
4
Tony Moreno
309W–153L career
2%98%0%
3.68
3.5
Kevin Heller
25W–24L career
7%93%0%
3.16

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.