Teams

Speed Bumps

2022 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-05vs Montana/Sheehan/18&Over8.0MXWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoshua Munro / Annie Murphy vs Nicholas Scott / Kathryn Kelly3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Sparks / Dawson Brooks vs James Stevens / Irma Spang7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSara Hemmer / Cody Maynard vs Kenneth Sheehan / Elizabeth Lund6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-05vs Montana/Sheehan/18&Over8.0MXLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnie Murphy / Joshua Munro vs Jon Catton / Andrea Hier3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Sparks / Samuel Sussman vs Kenneth Sheehan / Elizabeth Lund6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSara Hemmer / Cody Maynard vs Tara Jensen / Nicholas Scott4-6, 1-6
2022-06-04vs Montana/Sheehan/18&Over8.0MXLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmber Sparks / Dawson Brooks vs Nicholas Scott / Kathryn Kelly3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnnie Murphy / Joshua Munro vs James Stevens / Tara Jensen2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichelle Grocke / Cody Maynard vs Jon Catton / Andrea Hier1-6, 5-7
2022-06-04vs Montana/Sheehan/18&Over8.0MXLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Grocke / Cody Maynard vs Tara Jensen / James Stevens2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Sparks / Samuel Sussman vs Jon Catton / Andrea Hier4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnnie Murphy / Joshua Munro vs Kenneth Sheehan / Irma Spang2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Sheehan/18&Over8.0MX318410100
2Speed Bumps134818129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Amber Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.12
Joshua Munro
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.98
Sara Hemmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cody Maynard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Dawson Brooks
published
Michelle Grocke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Samuel Sussman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Hemmer + Joshua Munro2445% gamesnot enough data
Sara Hemmer + Cody Maynard3247% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Munro + Amber Sparks0534% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amber Sparks
54W–16L career · 7 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Joshua Munro
52W–72L career · 7 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Sara Hemmer
29W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Cody Maynard
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Dawson Brooks
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Grocke
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Samuel Sussman
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.