Teams

LJRO-Rode/Skybrook

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40s

10 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
Skybrook Swim and Racquet Club
Sep 21 6:30 PM
Skybrook Swim and Racquet Club
Sep 28 8:00 PM
at LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +
Bailey Road Park Tennis Court Complex
Oct 5 6:30 PM
Skybrook Swim and Racquet Club
Oct 12 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Jane Rodewald
Oct 19 6:30 PM
The Club at Westport
W#1 DoublesStephanie Campbell / Suzette Watson vs Maggie Strevell / Janet Novak4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Baldelli / Katherine Dugan vs Heather Bain / Michelle Potuzak1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Barnett / Shumbriar Ostapko vs Lauren Herrmann / Millie Harrington6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-08-17vs LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLeta Wiley / Lori Fuller vs Megan Hartley / Liz Barton3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Rodewald / Suzette Watson vs Jennifer Nogowski / Kelly Hallman2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Barnett / Patty Smith vs Kathryn Burdick / Cynthia Friess3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-10vs LJHI-Higgins/BaileyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Rodewald / Suzette Watson vs Caroline Pickup / Serena Igharas2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeta Wiley / Lori Fuller vs Cindy Japec / Karen Hallman6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesOdette Baker / Julie Phillips vs Jennifer Higgins / Alison Deaton3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 7.5 Women 40s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LSCL-Clancy/CRP2042544
2LJJO-Joiner/NMP2051548
3LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +2042551
4LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport1021317
5LWKI-King/CSD1142444
6LJHI-Higgins/Bailey1142761
7LLRU-Russell-Smith/LNRSC1133861
8LMKPO-Portaro/Jetton1133859
9LSCA-Cantey-Podesta/Peninsula1124861
10LAMC-McRorie-Dudan/Jetton0112427
11LNKA-Kayton-Robinson/CSD SPARTAN 7.50112435
12LNCH-Cheatham/PAC0103638
13LCAP-Aprile/RR0224966
14LJRO-Rode/Skybrook02151165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Suzette Watson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Leta Wiley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Odette Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Shumbriar Ostapko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Lori Fuller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Katherine Dugan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Jane Rodewald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Amy Barnett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Gretchen Earnshaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Patricia Baldelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shumbriar Ostapko + Suzette Watson6260% games+0.5% vs expected
Shumbriar Ostapko + Patricia Baldelli61541% games−5.6% vs expected
Jane Rodewald + Suzette Watson1542% games−9.9% vs expected
Shumbriar Ostapko + Leta Wiley7355% gamesnot enough data
Gretchen Earnshaw + Leta Wiley5357% gamesnot enough data
Leta Wiley + Jane Rodewald4452% gamesnot enough data
Shumbriar Ostapko + Jane Rodewald3443% gamesnot enough data
Jane Rodewald + Patricia Baldelli5260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Suzette Watson
60W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Leta Wiley
181W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Odette Baker
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Shumbriar Ostapko
67W–86L career · 1 line in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Lori Fuller
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Katherine Dugan
8W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Jane Rodewald
111W–99L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Amy Barnett
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Gretchen Earnshaw
124W–98L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Patricia Baldelli
40W–72L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.