Teams

BBTC Smith 2.5 Singles

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-18vs OSTC - MaloneWon 20
W#1 SinglesPam Berdine vs Kaelin Vegas3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLynn Hebert vs Sarah Malone6-1, 6-1
2024-12-11vs SRYC - DiSantiLost 02
L#1 SinglesPam Berdine vs Katy Boyer3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesElan Buckley vs Rebecca Powell6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-12-04Won 20
W#1 SinglesMollie Rockstad vs Kelly Robinson6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesElan Buckley vs Jennifer Mitchell6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-12-02Won 30
W#1 SinglesPam Berdine vs Kelly Robinson7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLynn Hebert vs Jennifer Mitchell6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesDana Delvescovo vs Nicole Rivera6-0, 6-1
2024-11-06vs OSTC - MaloneLost 12
W#1 SinglesLynn Hebert vs Kaelin Vegas6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTyler Ash vs Sarah Malone4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAnn Strange vs Carlie Saylor0-6, 2-6
2024-10-28vs SRYC - DiSantiSplit 11
L#1 SinglesElan Buckley vs Katy Boyer0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesDana Delvescovo vs Stephenie Baker7-6, 6-4
2024-10-23vs TOCC MitchellWon 21
L#1 SinglesLynn Hebert vs Ashley Gunn4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesPam Berdine vs Geralyn Roussel6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesDana Delvescovo vs Katherine Swetman6-2, 2-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Lynn Hebert
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.55
Dana Delvescovo
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.40
Pam Berdine
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.32
Rachel Gillenwater
published
2.07
Tyler Ash
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.02
Elan Buckley
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.86
Ann Strange
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Mollie Rockstad
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Hebert + Pam Berdine3549% games+6.4% vs expected
Dana Delvescovo + Pam Berdine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Hebert
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
3
Dana Delvescovo
22W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Pam Berdine
17W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.40
Rachel Gillenwater
8W–28L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
Tyler Ash
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Elan Buckley
11W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Ann Strange
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Mollie Rockstad
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.