Teams

LEBTC GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.81 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-22vs KC SILVERWon 31
W#1 DoublesShastin Hunzicker / Sally Pearson vs Kate LeClair / Elizabeth Pike2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Potarf vs Alana Paton5-7, 3-4
W#2 DoublesMary Dolhancey / Kimberly Graves vs Kristi McLaughlin / Kerry Anders6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHanne Schauer / Jody Walker vs Justine Needham / Laura Grush6-1, 6-1
2022-07-18vs KC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesShastin Hunzicker / Sally Pearson vs Candi Carpenito / Lenora Louie Phelps1-2
L#1 SinglesBecky Hodous vs Michelle Ziemian4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLana Banbury / Kimberly Graves vs Beth Day / Darcie Coy1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristie Bianco / Jody Walker vs Maret Lindgren / Erin Barnett6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2022-07-11vs SSHP BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesJody Walker / Mary Dolhancey vs Christa Dobbs / Shelley Flood4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesBecky Hodous vs Kim Riley6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShastin Hunzicker / Lana Banbury vs Anita Burns / Ann Baldwin6-3, 7-5
2022-06-27vs PH REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSally Pearson / Danielle Matsuyama vs Melodie Harris / Alicia Guerra6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Bianco vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLee Unger / Becky Hodous vs Karen Calderone / Kristine Kuettel2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJody Walker / Mary Dolhancey vs Christin Johnson / Anne Reese4-6, 6-7
2022-06-20vs BM TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesShastin Hunzicker / Danielle Matsuyama vs Jenny Kelly / Carolyn Schilling6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristie Bianco / Hanne Schauer vs Jennifer Tucker / Sandy McGregor2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary Dolhancey / Kimberly Graves vs Julie Pontiff / Gretchen Morrison1-6, 5-7
2022-06-13vs KC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesBecky Hodous / Kimberly Graves vs Darcie Coy / Candice Saxon4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Potarf vs Emily Oermann2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHanne Schauer / Christie Bianco vs Karla Elliot / Debra West6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLee Unger / Jody Walker vs Michelle Ziemian / Erin Barnett1-6, 1-6
2022-06-06vs SSHP BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesBecky Hodous / Mary Dolhancey vs Jaffe Biederman / Janelle Coughran1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChristie Bianco vs Kim Riley1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Matsuyama / Shastin Hunzicker vs Cathleen Cohen / Anita Burns7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHanne Schauer / Elizabeth Potarf vs Christa Dobbs / Shelley Flood2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Danielle Matsuyama
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Christie Bianco
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.61
Lana Banbury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Jody Walker
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Kimberly Graves
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Hanne Schauer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Becky Hodous
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Carole Dagnon
published 3.5
Elizabeth Potarf
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lee Unger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Dolhancey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Shastin Hunzicker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Dagnon + Becky Hodous6164% games+15.9% vs expected
Lana Banbury + Becky Hodous5456% games+10.3% vs expected
Christie Bianco + Carole Dagnon2353% games+6.8% vs expected
Jody Walker + Carole Dagnon144543% games−0.6% vs expected
Jody Walker + Hanne Schauer3545% games−2.8% vs expected
Becky Hodous + Mary Dolhancey81444% games−4.3% vs expected
Lana Banbury + Kimberly Graves224143% games−4.5% vs expected
Becky Hodous + Kimberly Graves2538% games−7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Matsuyama
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Christie Bianco
26W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Lana Banbury
53W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Jody Walker
51W–120L career · 5 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Kimberly Graves
59W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
4
Hanne Schauer
31W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Becky Hodous
120W–132L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Carole Dagnon
48W–88L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Elizabeth Potarf
6W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lee Unger
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Dolhancey
33W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shastin Hunzicker
18W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.