← Teams

GLVR-Greenberg/Jung

2020 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 4.04 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Eugene Jung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Elise Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.87
Jason Ruhmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Adam Gamboa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Zachary Kinavey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.78
Kristen Kopack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Carrie Putsch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Christy Strange
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Mary Klinger
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.69
David Greenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Scott Reis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Chris Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
John Jay
published 4
Results7 ties
2020-03-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesElise Anderson / Eugene Jung vs Chizuru Watanabe / Jason Shiloh Moore6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesChristy Strange / Zachary Kinavey vs Kyoko Adcock / David Pham1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristen Kopack / Jason Ruhmann vs Michelle Donato / Lee Crockett6-4, 6-1
2020-03-01Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesEugene Jung / Elise Anderson vs Steve Fogg / Lisa Fogg7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMeshi Chavez / Carrie Putsch vs Craig Hlady / Mary Hlady6-3, 6-4
2020-02-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesChris Collins / Carrie Putsch vs William Wang / Angie Lee6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristy Strange / Zachary Kinavey vs Andre Baran / Kimberly Anderson6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJason Ruhmann / Kristen Kopack vs Julia Karlin / Rick Karlin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2020-02-21Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesZachary Kinavey / Carrie Putsch vs Joshuah Kleiva / Cindy Rushall6-3, 5-3
L#2 DoublesAdam Gamboa / Mary Klinger vs Vincent Scopacasa / Lynne Annett4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Greenberg / Elise Anderson vs Yumiko Pike / Ben Yamaguchi6-2, 7-6
2020-02-07Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesZachary Kinavey / Carrie Putsch vs Thomas Carter / Geraldine Carter6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Ruhmann / Elise Anderson vs Michele Gray / Mark Stromme6-1, 6-4
2020-01-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChris Collins / Elise Anderson vs Vimal Natarajan / Sharon Kim-Geib6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Putsch / Scott Reis vs Irena Ilcheva / Rodger DeGeorge6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMeshi Chavez / Mary Klinger vs Carla Wheeler / Eric Means6-2, 7-5
2020-01-05Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesZachary Kinavey / Mary Klinger vs Vincent Scopacasa / Lynne Annett6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristy Strange / Jason Ruhmann vs Thomas Hutley / Cindy Rushall6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKristen Kopack / Meshi Chavez vs Daniel Lamey / Julie Carmena6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Eugene Jung
112W–35L career
0%97%2%
4.25
4.5
Elise Anderson
84W–81L career · type A
47%53%0%
3.88
4
Jason Ruhmann
110W–52L career
0%96%4%
3.87
4
Adam Gamboa
69W–38L career
0%97%3%
3.85
4
Zachary Kinavey
83W–41L career
6%87%8%
3.79
4
Kristen Kopack
70W–45L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
Carrie Putsch
62W–49L career
2%98%0%
3.73
4
Christy Strange
89W–67L career
1%98%0%
3.72
4
Mary Klinger
221W–142L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
David Greenberg
84W–40L career
2%98%0%
3.69
3.5
Scott Reis
56W–58L career
0%39%61%
3.65
4
Chris Collins
113W–56L career
24%76%0%
3.55
4
John Jay
39W–24L career
43%57%0%
3.47

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.