Teams

Johnson

2022 Neb. Adult 65&Over · 8.0 Adult Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-05-09vs NE/Martin/65&Over8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Foral / Sally Johnson vs Maxine Martin / Nancy Samson6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Crook / Karla Giersch vs Victoria Leigh Glesmann / Linda McIntyre6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDenise Johnson / Patti Tobia vs Nicolette Diamantis / Tory Jorgensen3-6, 4-6
2022-04-27vs NE/Martin/65&Over8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMargaret Scofield / Patti Tobia vs Nicolette Diamantis / Nancy Samson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Crook / Denise Johnson vs Tory Jorgensen / Maxine Martin6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Gassman / Sally Johnson vs Lindsey Johanek / Susie Weberg3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Denise Johnson
published 4
3.32
Kim Foral
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Margaret Scofield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Patti Tobia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Crook
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Karla Giersch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Gassman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Foral + Patti Tobia7648% games−0.9% vs expected
Karen Crook + Karla Giersch134 matchesnot enough data
Kim Foral + Karla Giersch033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Denise Johnson
34W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Foral
39W–33L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Margaret Scofield
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Patti Tobia
45W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Karen Crook
19W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karla Giersch
17W–28L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Gassman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sally Johnson
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.