Teams

SFV - Supreme Courters 3.5

2025 Adult 18 SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Sara Heum
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.48
Esther Hwang
published
3.48
Jennifer Bevan
published
3.46
Michelle Halpern
published
3.37
Margie Englis
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Catherine Haggett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Kiyomi Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Alicia Duran
published 3.5
3.15
Patricia Friedman
published
3.10
Keiko Kato Verrier
published
2.83
Stella Dumlao-Idea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Allison Dunne
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kiyomi Fisher + Catherine Haggett71147% games+1.3% vs expected
Kiyomi Fisher + Margie Englis2442% games−10.6% vs expected
Stella Dumlao-Idea + Margie Englis5351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sara Heum
122W–69L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Esther Hwang
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Jennifer Bevan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Michelle Halpern
25W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Catherine Haggett
99W–122L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Kiyomi Fisher
87W–140L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Alicia Duran
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Friedman
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Keiko Kato Verrier
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
3
Stella Dumlao-Idea
180W–184L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Allison Dunne
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.