Teams

Rockwood Park Powers Plays

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-01vs Belmont SaulWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristen Powers / Lynette Villadelgado vs Stacy Sherdel / Tatenda Mupfudze6-1, 6-1
2023-10-18vs HCC Gnapp / MugfordWon 10
W#2 DoublesLynette Villadelgado / Heather Hogan vs Debra Suyama / Julie Brandt6-3, 6-3
2023-10-11vs HCC Walsh \ JurkutaWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristen Powers / Lynette Villadelgado vs Elizabeth Jurkuta / Andrea Broughton6-2, 6-3
2023-10-04vs RMC FlowersLost 01
L#2 DoublesGail Covert / Kristen Powers vs Melissa Ganzert / Mary Spagnolo3-6, 4-6
2023-09-27vs WOCC KramerLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Powers / Angie Pearson vs Laura Vetter / Leslie Gayne4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLynette Villadelgado / Gail Covert vs Nan McKenney / Louise Bald4-6, 3-6
2023-09-20vs MAC Maniacs BatesWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristen Powers / Lynette Villadelgado vs Susanna Dodd / Timea Harisova6-2, 6-2
2023-09-13vs Huguenot Park MetzLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristen Powers / Gail Covert vs Martha Rhodes / Donna Lawson6-7, 2-6
2023-09-06vs SCC GiesWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristen Powers / Lynette Villadelgado vs Debby Gies / Pamela Moncur6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Eleanor Gardner
published
3.01
Angie Pearson
published 3.5
2.93
Jeanne Albright
published
2.93
Kristen Powers
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
2.87
Lynette Villadelgado
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Adrienne Foster
published 3
2.70
Paige Wesselink
published
2.32
Greta Satterfield
published
2.26
Gail Covert
published
Heather Hogan
published
Tina Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynette Villadelgado + Kristen Powers12462% games+4.1% vs expected
Greta Satterfield + Gail Covert044 matchesnot enough data
Gail Covert + Adrienne Foster134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eleanor Gardner
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Angie Pearson
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jeanne Albright
11W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kristen Powers
188W–193L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lynette Villadelgado
132W–130L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Adrienne Foster
20W–26L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Paige Wesselink
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Greta Satterfield
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32
Gail Covert
14W–23L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.26
Heather Hogan
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Hicks
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.