Teams

KY/LEX, Wilson, Mike

2022 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-02-26vs KY/LEX/SPARKSWon 10
W#1 DoublesGheorghe Ignat / James Wheeler vs Phil Jeter / Michael Kennedy7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2022-02-17vs KY/LEX/Jones, JeffreyWon 10
W#2 DoublesRick Prior / Gheorghe Ignat vs David Gillispie / Joe Ross6-0, 6-4
2022-01-26vs KY/LEX/Castle-HowardLost 01
L#2 DoublesMyoungkun Jeoung / Gheorghe Ignat vs Anthony de Movellan / Steve Holsclaw6-7, 4-6
2022-01-14vs KY/LEX/Jones, JeffreyWon 10
W#1 DoublesGheorghe Ignat / Rick Prior vs Navin Rajagopalan / Johan Graham6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Wheeler
published 4
3.55
Rick Prior
published
3.48
Gheorghe Ignat
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Chris Tallon
published 3.5
3.32
Warren Leighton
published
3.26
Gary Spratt
published 3.5
3.26
Dave Messner
published 3.5
3.22
Troy Qualls
published
3.20
Ricky Coffey
published
3.16
Anthony Pellegrino
published 3.5
3.13
Mike Wilson
published
3.00
Huston Wells
published 3.5
2.76
Dave Least
published 3
Jeff Bramble
published
Mark Stepp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Messner + Gary Spratt31041% games+5.7% vs expected
Ricky Coffey + Gary Spratt4448% games−2.0% vs expected
Mike Wilson + Dave Messner1435% games−2.1% vs expected
Anthony Pellegrino + Dave Messner2529% games−5.6% vs expected
Ricky Coffey + Dave Messner3545% games−5.7% vs expected
Ricky Coffey + Dave Least3248% games−8.2% vs expected
Ricky Coffey + Rick Prior2343% gamesnot enough data
Rick Prior + Dave Messner2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Wheeler
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rick Prior
29W–102L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Gheorghe Ignat
212W–125L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Chris Tallon
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Warren Leighton
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Gary Spratt
32W–83L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Dave Messner
33W–78L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Troy Qualls
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Ricky Coffey
35W–95L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Anthony Pellegrino
12W–38L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Mike Wilson
6W–37L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Huston Wells
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Dave Least
11W–46L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Jeff Bramble
2W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Stepp
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.