Teams

KS/Foster/18&Over2.5W

2026 KS 18 & Over Adult Indoor League · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-01vs Elting-SalinaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLexie Farha / Ashley Brown vs Gabriel Levinson / Daschie Hrenchir2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJanine Kesterson-cravens vs Abigail Lombardoni0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSara Ayesh / Patty Malone vs Carrie Elting / Nicki Merkle6-1, 6-3
2026-03-01vs Elting-SalinaWon 20
W#1 DoublesSara Ayesh / Lexie Farha vs Gabriel Levinson / Nicki Merkle6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPatty Malone / Janine Kesterson-cravens vs Carrie Elting / Daschie Hrenchir3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-26vs Lady AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesLexie Farha / Ashley Brown vs MichaelAnn Cohlmia / Johana Teta6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesErica Ammar vs Leila Loomis4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSara Ayesh / Chloe Spencer vs Alexandra Ahumada Palma / Carole Ryan7-5, 6-1
2026-02-19vs Lady AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesSara Ayesh / Ashley Brown vs Katherine Winner / Taryn Stoica6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLexie Farha / Danielle Cornejo vs MichaelAnn Cohlmia / Theresa Devlin6-2, 6-1
2026-02-12vs Lady AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesErica Ammar / Haley Mason vs Alexandra Ahumada Palma / Leila Loomis1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJanine Kesterson-cravens vs Taryn Stoica6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnita Haycook / Ashley Brown vs Rosanne Greene / Kim Ritchie2-6, 6-7
2026-02-08vs Elting-SalinaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChloe Spencer / Sara Ayesh vs Carrie Elting / Abigail Lombardoni2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesErica Ammar / Haley Mason vs Nicki Merkle / Daschie Hrenchir6-2, 6-2
2026-02-08vs Elting-SalinaWon 21
W#1 DoublesErica Ammar / Ashley Brown vs Carrie Elting / Daschie Hrenchir6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHaley Mason vs Abigail Lombardoni2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChloe Spencer / Sara Ayesh vs Nicki Merkle / Gabriel Levinson7-5, 6-1
2026-02-02vs Lady AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesErica Ammar / Lexie Farha vs Jenny Cole / Marilyn Sanders6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJanine Kesterson-cravens vs Rosanne Greene3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChloe Spencer / Sara Ayesh vs Katherine Winner / Theresa Devlin6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KS/Foster/18&Over2.5W62141021182
2Elting-Salina5315924204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Erica Ammar
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.50
Janine Kesterson-cravens
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.43
Lexie Farha
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.43
Chloe Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.41
Sara Ayesh
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.36
Ryan Clem
published
2.33
Nancy Moxley
published
2.26
Haley Mason
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Danielle Cornejo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.87
Anita Haycook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chloe Spencer + Sara Ayesh5168% games+8.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erica Ammar
11W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%32%68%
2.56
Janine Kesterson-cravens
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Lexie Farha
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
2.5
Chloe Spencer
7W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%70%30%
2.43
Sara Ayesh
10W–1L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Ryan Clem
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Nancy Moxley
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Haley Mason
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Danielle Cornejo
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Anita Haycook
0W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.