Teams

Sonterra Slammers

2025 40 & OVER SATURDAY MEN · 3.0 MEN

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-22vs Shavano Tennis Park Double ShotsLost 05
L#1 DoublesMichael Bigley / Alex Condos vs Michael Saylor / Brian Schwegler5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesShiva Sandrana vs Nando Gonzalez5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesScott McClure / Hector Diaz-Escobar vs Drew Fisher / DANIEL BARRON5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrent Mccrary / Mark Garcia vs Greg Schmid / Steven Bailey0-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesJames SENARY / Carlos Hernandez vs Robert Shelby / Thad Hogan II6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Jim Row
published
3.06
Shiva Sandrana
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Mohammed Lilo
published
2.76
Michael Bigley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Jeffrey Kinney
published
2.69
Patrick Foster
published
2.68
Tom Little
published
2.64
MATT NEWMAN
published
2.53
Alex Condos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.50
Hector Diaz-Escobar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Scott McClure
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
James SENARY
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Brent Mccrary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Herb McDougall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Bigley + Alex Condos134 matchesnot enough data
Scott McClure + Hector Diaz-Escobar033 matchesnot enough data
James SENARY + Brent Mccrary033 matchesnot enough data
Jim Row + Patrick Foster123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jim Row
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.18
Shiva Sandrana
6W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Mohammed Lilo
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Michael Bigley
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Jeffrey Kinney
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Patrick Foster
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Tom Little
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
MATT NEWMAN
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
2.5
Alex Condos
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
Hector Diaz-Escobar
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Scott McClure
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
James SENARY
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.41
2.5
Brent Mccrary
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
Herb McDougall
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.