Teams

Ford - RS Clay

2026 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-21vs Essex - SHLLost 13
W#1 DoublesTori Baker / Julie Reed vs Carol Essex / Shari Essex6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCourtney Fell vs Susan Rice4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKlara Szalai / Barbie Doherty vs Sandra Wilson / Laura Savoie5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSissy Ford / Kimberly Etscheid vs Dana Persons / Nena Haigler3-6, 4-6
2026-04-14vs Nguyen - RS ClayLost 12
W#1 DoublesTori Baker / Julie Reed vs Bonnie Bucco / Mecy Wimberly6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKlara Szalai / Barbie Doherty vs Tanya Hughes / Jacqueline Wallace6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCourtney Fell / Kimberly Etscheid vs Kathy Ross / Susan Barlow2-6, 2-6
2026-04-07vs McElhany - PCCLost 13
L#1 DoublesSissy Ford / Kimberly Etscheid vs Kate Major / Valerie Wilson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCourtney Fell vs Lauren Burch3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKim Gall / Julie Reed vs Denise Prindiville / Denise Wilson7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbie Doherty / Michelle Knisely vs Terri Ammons / Amanda Davies0-6, 3-6
2026-03-31vs Essex - SHLLost 13
L#1 DoublesKim Gall / Barbie Doherty vs Shari Essex / Alisha Krecidlo0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCourtney Fell vs Cheryl Vann0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTori Baker / Mary Varela vs Susan Rice / Katie Hovanec6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKimberly Etscheid / Klara Szalai vs Carol Essex / Dana Persons2-6, 5-7
2026-03-29vs Bryan - RS ClayLost 13
L#1 DoublesSissy Ford / Kimberly Etscheid vs Mary Bryan / Emily Mattes1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKim Gall vs Sharon Powell7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Reed / Tori Baker vs Jill Kunkel / Ashley Wheeler3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKlara Szalai / Mary Varela vs Sally Bergosh / Ann Scott1-6, 3-6
2026-03-17vs Nguyen - RS ClayLost 04
L#1 DoublesSissy Ford / Kimberly Etscheid vs Gloria Langan / Susan Barlow7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCourtney Fell vs Bonnie Bucco4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKlara Szalai / Kim Gall vs Sue Nast / Mecy Wimberly6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Knisely / Barbie Doherty vs Thuy Nguyen / Kathy Ross2-6, 1-6
2026-03-10vs Escambia/TanLost 04
L#1 DoublesKim Gall / Peggy van Sleen vs Kristyn Miller / Rene Abel3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSissy Ford vs Parrish Walker0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKlara Szalai / Tori Baker vs Aivel Dadisman / Chelsea Simpson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbie Doherty / Kimberly Etscheid vs Kimberly Fortier / Oliva Smith2-6, 3-6
2026-03-04vs McElhany - PCCLost 04
L#1 DoublesKlara Szalai / Barbie Doherty vs Natalie Mcelhany / Amanda Davies4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCourtney Fell vs Denise Prindiville0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKim Gall / Tori Baker vs Valerie Wilson / Jill Gonzalez1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Etscheid / Sissy Ford vs Denise Wilson / Terri Ammons3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Kim Gall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Sissy Ford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Klara Szalai
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.94
Barbie Doherty
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.93
Tori Baker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Julie Reed
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Michelle Knisely
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Courtney Fell
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.67
Kimberly Etscheid
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Joyce Cook
published
Mary Varela
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Peggy van Sleen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Etscheid + Sissy Ford2642% games−0.9% vs expected
Julie Reed + Tori Baker213 matchesnot enough data
Klara Szalai + Barbie Doherty033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Gall
3W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.12
Sissy Ford
9W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Klara Szalai
4W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
3.5
Barbie Doherty
0W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Tori Baker
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93
Julie Reed
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89
Michelle Knisely
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Courtney Fell
5W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Kimberly Etscheid
4W–16L career · 12 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Joyce Cook
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Varela
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peggy van Sleen
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.