Teams

Honeycutt/hcp/foothillls

2025 Foothills Spring 40 & Over League · Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-22Won 20
W#2 DoublesJathan Sharkey / Greg Diamonti vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Eckard / Robert Womack vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-22vs Qualifier TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesJathan Sharkey / Greg Diamonti vs Brad Morgan / Alex Boone3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKevin Whitener vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKenneth Moore / Ramsey Dellinger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-10vs Qualifier TeamWon 20
W#2 DoublesKevin Whitener / Kenneth Moore vs Charlie Zagaroli / Eric Geyer6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Eckard / Robert Womack vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-10vs Qualifier TeamWon 20
W#1 SinglesRamsey Dellinger vs Jeremy Fortner6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMark Eckard / Robert Womack vs Charlie Zagaroli / Eric Geyer6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Haynes King
published
3.51
Lawrence Thompson
published
3.49
3.37
Kevin Whitener
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Ryan Postlethwait
published
3.32
Ramsey Dellinger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Mark Eckard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Edward Rix
published
3.21
Robert Womack
published
3.18
Andy Rhoney
published 3.5
2.99
Greg Diamonti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jathan Sharkey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Whitener + Ramsey Dellinger3450% games−1.3% vs expected
Mark Eckard + Ramsey Dellinger3647% games−10.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Haynes King
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Lawrence Thompson
22W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Kevin Whitener
43W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Ryan Postlethwait
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Ramsey Dellinger
63W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Mark Eckard
48W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Edward Rix
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Robert Womack
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Andy Rhoney
2W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Greg Diamonti
33W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Jathan Sharkey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.